Re: Theaving Goths
- From: "Matthew North" <alllivingfear@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:47:15 +0100
> i might be stating the obvious here, but maybe if you formed a good band
> that had music people actually wanted to listen to (such as Trent Reznor)
> you wouldnt be so bitter about someone downloading the odd track for free
> (since you'd have your money already from the recording contract)
>
> i'm not speaking about you personally
doesnt sound like it to me,
here but there a billion mediocre
> artists with a billion more tracks out there and all are up for grabs as
> freebie mp3's. why the hell should we pay for mediocre music?
Listen Adolf
ALL artists weather you like them or not should havre the abolity to control
what part of their product can and cant be distributed for free, speaking as
an unsugned artist, since the advent of MP3 sales for small bands have
falled dramatically, and the more mp3s that go around will result in one
thing and ine thing only, artist not releaseing any new material because
they simply cant afford to without 'Some' sales and all this file sharers
buy more music bollox, well thats bloody obvious isnt it, they buy what they
cant steel for free.
Matthew
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: David Damerell
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: Grave
- Re: Theaving Goths
- References:
- Theaving Goths
- From: Matthew North
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: Peter Constantine
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: Matthew North
- Re: Theaving Goths
- From: Grave
- Theaving Goths
- Prev by Date: Re: ** AMATIS ** Saturday 17/09/05 Glasgow
- Next by Date: Re: Theaving Goths
- Previous by thread: Re: Theaving Goths
- Next by thread: Re: Theaving Goths
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|