Re: is is all dead?
- From: ReVulse <ReVulse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 13:47:28 GMT
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 13:29:55 +0000, Grave wrote:
> punk is all but dead
I would have to dispute that. The music and sub-culture has continued
since the 70's. The harder stuff has gone back underground and is ignored
by the media, whilst the more commercial stuff has been embraced by a
new generation and is considered quite mainstream.
To a degree, it's a case of "What Is Punk?" anyway. For instance, if The
Exploited and Buzzcocks are called "punk" then it leaves a wide variety of
music and image which could possibly fall into the category.
#Andy#
np: S.K.E.T. - Energija
.
- References:
- is is all dead?
- From: the Girl who wanted to be God
- Re: is is all dead?
- From: Toby Cyberbat
- Re: is is all dead?
- From: oldgoth
- Re: is is all dead?
- From: rikky filth
- Re: is is all dead?
- From: Grave
- is is all dead?
- Prev by Date: Re: is is all dead?
- Next by Date: Re: is is all dead?
- Previous by thread: Re: is is all dead?
- Next by thread: Re: is is all dead?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|