Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: "H Duffy" <Hester_Duffy_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 17:21:58 +0100
"whisky-dave" <whisky-dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dagthv$njp$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "H Duffy" <Hester_Duffy_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:3j28ekFo2v78U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> What would you call "proper evidence"?
>
> Documented, tested, retested and then result discussed openly.
Documented by whom? Tested by whom? Retested by whom?
And what _sort_ of evidence? If it were clearly documented, tested and
retested and discussed, that fish who have suffered an injury will tend to
press the injury site up against something, would that constitute proof that
they feel pain? If it were shown, documented, tested and retested, that
their heart-rates rise in response to injury, would you accept that as
evidence that they feel pain?
Please be specific here.
H
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: kinslerp
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Prev by Date: Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Next by Date: Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Previous by thread: Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Next by thread: Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading