Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: "H Duffy" <Hester_Duffy_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 12:32:51 +0100
"whisky-dave" <whisky-dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dait66$cgo$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "H Duffy" <Hester_Duffy_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:3j2epaFo23e5U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Documented by whom? Tested by whom? Retested by whom?
> Those that no what they are doing rather than those quoting things that
> just aren't true.
Such as, for example? The BBC? Academic biologists? Fishermen? Please be
specific, rather than just giving vague descriptions.
>
>> And what _sort_ of evidence? If it were clearly documented, tested and
>> retested and discussed, that fish who have suffered an injury will tend
>> to press the injury site up against something, would that constitute
>> proof that they feel pain?
> No it would not by itself.
>
>> If it were shown, documented, tested and retested, that their heart-rates
>> rise in response to injury,
> Heart rates rise when they are stressed ,being stressed is
> not the same as feeling pain.
OK, so what sort of evidence _would_ you accept?
>
>>would you accept that as evidence that they feel pain?
>> Please be specific here.
>
> NO, is that specific enough ?
No; I want to know specifically what sort of evidence you _would_ accept.
H
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: kinslerp
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Prev by Date: The Way Of All Flesh Live on Saturday at Dr Fell's.
- Next by Date: Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Previous by thread: Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Next by thread: Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading