Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: "whisky-dave" <whisky-dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 10:47:39 +0100
"H Duffy" <Hester_Duffy_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3j4i72Fns7erU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "whisky-dave" <whisky-dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:dait66$cgo$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "H Duffy" <Hester_Duffy_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:3j2epaFo23e5U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Documented by whom? Tested by whom? Retested by whom?
>> Those that no what they are doing rather than those quoting things that
>> just aren't true.
>
> Such as, for example? The BBC? Academic biologists? Fishermen? Please be
> specific, rather than just giving vague descriptions.
Those that can back up their beliefs with facts that are measurable and
provable
and repeatable.
>> Heart rates rise when they are stressed ,being stressed is
>> not the same as feeling pain.
>
> OK, so what sort of evidence _would_ you accept?
What sort well there's isn't a spacific sort it has to be
repeatable and testable, comparible with other tests.
>>>would you accept that as evidence that they feel pain?
>>> Please be specific here.
>>
>> NO, is that specific enough ?
>
> No; I want to know specifically what sort of evidence you _would_ accept.
The same sort you'd expect of aliens.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: kinslerp
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Prev by Date: (SETLIST) The Coven 3rd Anniversary Special
- Next by Date: Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Previous by thread: Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Next by thread: Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading