Re: Chavs
- From: cixnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (/mel/)
- Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 20:47 +0100 (BST)
mhid79@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (The Astute Cat) wrote:
> In the end of the day, one social subcultural group cannot be any
> better or worse than the other.
Excuse me? Oh yes they can. (This does not mean to say that any single
individual can be said to be typical of the group).
> Naturally, the member of one will not
> think highly of the other, except where impromptu alliances are
> formed. If one thinks of it in terms of gangs or evening political
> factions, it becomes a lot easier to define them, or at least to
> understand the mentality of the interaction that any one group takes.
>
> Example: If it suddenly became popular for 'chavs' to wear black, do
> you suppose Goths would do the same?
It suddenly became popular for chavs to have mohicans, and that didn't
stop me having mine.
--
/mel/
np: silence
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Chavs
- From: The Astute Cat
- Re: Chavs
Relevant Pages
|
Loading