Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: "H Duffy" <Hester_Duffy_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 12:37:30 +0100
"whisky-dave" <whisky-dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:daavf1$rh5$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "H Duffy" <Hester_Duffy_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:3iko70Flv0p6U2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Yes, but that doesn't mean it's not physical. We have various reflexes,
>> for
>> example, which are ways in which our body responds to pain, even if we
>> are
>> not consciously aware of the pain.
>
> So it's not pain then is it, you just can't label every action or
> response and
> say it indictates pain.
You can't label _every_ action or response as pain, but you can label the
painful ones as pain.
H
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [EVENT] BLACK CELEBRATION 7
- Next by Date: Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Previous by thread: Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Next by thread: Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
