Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: "whisky-dave" <whisky-dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 13:08:50 +0100
"H Duffy" <Hester_Duffy_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3islblFmstchU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "whisky-dave" <whisky-dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:daavf1$rh5$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "H Duffy" <Hester_Duffy_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:3iko70Flv0p6U2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Yes, but that doesn't mean it's not physical. We have various reflexes,
>>> for
>>> example, which are ways in which our body responds to pain, even if we
>>> are
>>> not consciously aware of the pain.
>>
>> So it's not pain then is it, you just can't label every action or
>> response and
>> say it indictates pain.
>
> You can't label _every_ action or response as pain, but you can label the
> painful ones as pain.
But are those the type fish experience, that is the question, nuffing about
2Bs
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Prev by Date: Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Next by Date: Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Previous by thread: Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Next by thread: Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|