Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: "whisky-dave" <whisky-dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 10:40:57 +0100
"H Duffy" <Hester_Duffy_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3iuqk3Fn08jtU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "whisky-dave" <whisky-dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:dab8sk$tu$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "H Duffy" <Hester_Duffy_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:3islblFmstchU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> You can't label _every_ action or response as pain, but you can label
>>> the painful ones as pain.
>>
>> But are those the type fish experience, that is the question, nuffing
>> about 2Bs
>
> Given the evidence, yes, it seems highly likely that fish do indeed feel
> pain, and respond to it.
Well I've not seen 'all' this evidence of pain so I'm not sure yet.
Until I see a bit more scientific evidence rather than rhetoric
I'm not convinced it's the same feeling.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Prev by Date: Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Next by Date: Re: Supernatural exsperiances.
- Previous by thread: Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Next by thread: Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|