Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: "whisky-dave" <whisky-dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 11:45:01 +0100
"H Duffy" <Hester_Duffy_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3jnmnoFq3pnhU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "whisky-dave" <whisky-dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:db5qva$cia$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "H Duffy" <Hester_Duffy_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:3jn35dFqbdeuU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Why not ask the professionals in the field.
>
> Because they can't tell me what _you_ would accept; they could tell me
> what _they_ accept, but you've made it clear that that's irrelevant to
> you.
I would listen to professionals, not veggies with a degree in recycling and
have
a chip on their shoulder about animal rights and plant bombs under peoples
cars.
>> yes so go prove it.
>
> Prove _what_, Dave? I'm not stating a case here, I'm asking you to give me
> some examples of behaviours which would prove that fish feel pain, or that
> they don't.
I haven't seen such behaviours that can't be put down to distress or
illness.
>> I know you've think increased heart rate could, but as I said I rejected
>> that immediately.
>
> yes, I know, and you _keep_ repeating that, for some reason. I'm not
> trying to convince you that an increased heart-rate is proof of pain, I'm
> trying to find out from you what _would_ be proof of pain.
That's the problem I don't know of anything.
As I said it's liek asking you what would be requird for you
to believe that anything from a rock to a goth comes from earth rather than
mars.
It's all very well to say run tests but what will they mean.
>> So in your profession what would, prove to you that babies
>> felt pain, try a really easy one first that is prove to me that babies
>> feel pain.
>
> You know they used to believe that babies didn't feel pain? They used
> paralytic drugs instead of anaesthetics for young babies; after all, if
> they weren't struggling or crying (because they'd been injected with
> curare and therefore were physically unable to cry or struggle) they must
> not be feeling anything.
> Except that of course that's not true; babies feel pain just as we do.
<My Yoda impression> Prove it, just how would you.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: kinslerp
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: whisky-dave
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- From: H Duffy
- Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Prev by Date: Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Next by Date: Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Previous by thread: Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Next by thread: Re: Fish don't have ethical feet it doesn't mean they can't move- was Re: Ethical feet
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|