Re: Disabled folks and RoW
- From: "mart2306@xxxxxxxxxxx" <mart2306@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 00:46:12 -0700 (PDT)
On 20 Sep, 01:42, Palindrome <m...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
turt...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:14:51 GMT, Palindrome <m...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:<snip>
Styles are one thing. But a tarmac'ed path up the side of a Dartmoor
stream, with bridges across every gully, no.
I have mislead you again. I am only talking of RoW. I must remember to
make myself clearer when posting.
I'm talking about public footpaths and pack-horse trails across
Dartmoor. Signposted RoW.
The problem isn't so much mud as foot-deep water - where a stream
crosses the path, there may be stepping stones. Or a clapper bridge. Or
just the water. Where a tor is encountered, roughly quarried "steps"
with narrow gullies crossing them and gaps where a boulder has rolled
out. Many can't even be navigated with a mountain bike, let alone a
wheelchair..
It is those sorts of paths that *are* being converted into tarmac'ed
paths, with wooden bridges across the streams and back and forth ramps
on the steep bits.. Why? Disabled access... The council, with EU money,
has just spent 450,00GBP on one 5 mile stretch. Go figure. Phase 2 will
add another 5 miles. Including adding street lamps in places..
--
Sue
And yet what difference that £450k could make on improving facilities
for diabled in local towns..........
Ah well. EU money tends to have a price attached. Such things as
'maintaining' what the EU has paid to have done.....
Martin <><
.
- References:
- Re: Disabled folks and RoW
- From: Burgerman
- Re: Disabled folks and RoW
- From: turtill
- Re: Disabled folks and RoW
- From: Palindrome
- Re: Disabled folks and RoW
- From: turtill
- Re: Disabled folks and RoW
- From: Palindrome
- Re: Disabled folks and RoW
- Prev by Date: Re: Disabled folks and RoW
- Next by Date: Re: Disabled folks and RoW
- Previous by thread: Re: Disabled folks and RoW
- Next by thread: Re: Disabled folks and RoW
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|