Re: Peter Turtill stop emailing me
- From: The voice of Truth <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:03:17 +0100
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:57:30 +0100, "Saleh Jambo"
<salehjambo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Please Peter Turtill, stop emailing me. I do not wish to enter into any
>conversation with you and I consider your email to be harassment.
>
>Its no good pleading with me to keep quiet about all those girls in Africa.
>If I feel the need I will tell all
>
>I mean you arent a paedophile are you. Those girls were over
>age.............werent they ?
>
>
Yeah Turtill likes em young dont he:
From: smicker
Newsgroups: uk.legal
Subject: Re: Murdered paedophile
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 00:25:48 +0000
Lines: 60
Message-ID: <8l72tvsdt5lqbihsq9j4gfe090nr24rr9u@xxxxxxx>
References:
<307aa6ab.0312011636.3e365f6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><83krsvgibdlsm6ds59tlb5oq5hcmf6k8vg@xxxxxxx>
>6l61tvcblj9lgi17a2f3fdqprs5ngs94s7@xxxxxxx>
NNTP-Posting-Host: host81-128-200-189.in-addr.btopenworld.com
(81.128.200.189)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1070670284 72747129 81.128.200.189
([172695])
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 20:35:48 +0000 (UTC), "Derek Hornby"
wrote:
>"smicker" wrote
>
>I believe I have made a mistake here
>
>Not the first time, and sure won't be the last time either.
>
>> You are not saying it is ok for you to have sex with 13-14 year olds.
You are
>> syaing you would not do this because it is against the present law in
this
>> country but as they are old enough to know what they are doing you
would have
>> sex with them in another country where it is legal or you would have sex
>>with them in this country if it was not against the law.
You have not answered the above. It is surely quite an easy question
isn't it if you think that children of 10 should be legally liable for
their actions?
>I do believe it's very very common young teens under age of sexual
consent,
> having sexual relationships.
>Why do you think so many of them are on the pill?
Because they are having sex of course and probably because some of
them are "on the game"?
>> I have been making a mistake here.
>
>You sure have.
>
>> You do respect the law as far as having sex with children is concerned
and
>> obviously you wouldn't do it in this country because it is against the
law
>> but in anothe country it would be alright as long as it wasn't against
the
>> law. I understand now.
>
>Do you ? I think not as you failed to respond to the other points:
You've lost me now. What have I failed to respond too. Now don't go
pushing your luck too far as you know I do not usually engage in
debate with you so make the best of your chance while you have it.
>I will try to put it more simply, so that you have less of a problem
>understanding.
That is most considerate of you Sir.
> What is the minimum age you feel is acceptable, for a girl to have sex?
>Uk law says 16
>Do you think a 13 14 15 year old is older enough to make an informed
>decision. If the answer is no, then do you accept that those under
>16 should never be jailed for serious crimes like murder, as how can it be
>right to punish those that are too young to understand, right, from wrong?
I've had sex with 13 14 15 year olds and in this country too not
Bangkok. I see no problem with it personally if they can understand
what their bodies are telling them. It is taken for granted in some
parts of the world I can tell you. I also know that those under 16 are
punished for serious crimes even in this country. Where's your
problem?
smicker
.
- References:
- Peter Turtill stop emailing me
- From: Saleh Jambo
- Peter Turtill stop emailing me
- Prev by Date: Peter Turtill stop emailing me
- Next by Date: More Turtill abuse
- Previous by thread: Peter Turtill stop emailing me
- Next by thread: More Turtill abuse
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
