Re: Missing Parcel
- From: "Pat" <psweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 19:59:20 -0000
"Stuart B" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:cbhru2dftvf8eqjh3n62naklpf2phpfvlc@xxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 19:21:58 -0000, Colm <C@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Pat [psweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] said:Eh ???
"Seb" <sebastian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
I know its a bitch when its you that loses out in the end, but you'll
just
have to take it as a lesson learnt.
How true.
I think its bad though still that she was offered SD or whatever method
she
wanted and she chose the cheapest to save money. Now i have to foot the
bill
because she tried to save a fiver;
The buyer was not saving money as this was not the buyer's bill, and I
am guessing that they probably knew this.
Buyer pays one of two amounts for shipping .She elects to pay the
lesser amount .She saves money does she not ????. Buyers on Ebay pay
P+P.
Thats my gripe. She was offered the two and insisted on the cheaper option.
I didnt want her pulling out of the auction and rating me bad if I refused
to sent the item. On my ebay auction I specified two seperate postages. SD
and SP.
I also have it in my buying terms and conditions that ater its left me its
not my problem and down to the buyer and RM. But having read these messages
I dont think this counts.
So I have a disclaimer saying just that, buyer, buys but my discclimer is
againgst the law?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Missing Parcel
- From: Peter Parry
- Re: Missing Parcel
- From: Owain
- Re: Missing Parcel
- References:
- Missing Parcel
- From: Pat
- Re: Missing Parcel
- From: Pat
- Re: Missing Parcel
- From: Pat
- Re: Missing Parcel
- From: Seb
- Re: Missing Parcel
- From: Pat
- Re: Missing Parcel
- From: Seb
- Re: Missing Parcel
- From: Pat
- Re: Missing Parcel
- From: Stuart B
- Missing Parcel
- Prev by Date: Re: Missing Parcel
- Next by Date: Newby can't upload pic
- Previous by thread: Re: Missing Parcel
- Next by thread: Re: Missing Parcel
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|