Re: Not tested???
- From: Mark S. <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:45:12 +0000
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:02:38 -0000, "MJP" <mjpjunk32@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
>"Partac" <zorbathegreek@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:drlu8i$d2s$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "john" <pit@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:PYuDf.65456$zt1.29030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> "MJP" <mjpjunk32@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:43de6563$0$59555$892e7fe2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>I have been given a laptop CPU, pentium 4 3.2ghz procesor. I have no way
>>>>of testing this.
>>>>
>>>> I know that if I look and see in the description "not tested" I
>>>> generally take it to mean tested but did not work.
>>>>
>>>> Any thoughts on this.
>>>>
>>>> MJP
>
>Thanks for all the replies and comments, and I thought it was such an
>innocuous question.
>
>It has helped in the fact that what may seem clear at the time of writing
>may easily be misinterpreted from a different viewpoint.
>
>
>MJP
>
I listed an Extended Warranty pack for a laptop and had couple of
people think it was a laptop... even though there was a clear picture
of the booklet. :-)
Mark S.
.
- References:
- Not tested???
- From: MJP
- Re: Not tested???
- From: john
- Re: Not tested???
- From: Partac
- Re: Not tested???
- From: MJP
- Not tested???
- Prev by Date: Re: MAKE MONEY QUICK AND HASSLE FREE!!!!!
- Next by Date: Re: Not tested???
- Previous by thread: Re: Not tested???
- Next by thread: Re: Not tested???
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|