Re: Not tested???


"Partac" <zorbathegreek@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:drlu8i$d2s$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "john" <pit@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:PYuDf.65456$zt1.29030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "MJP" <mjpjunk32@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:43de6563$0$59555$892e7fe2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>I have been given a laptop CPU, pentium 4 3.2ghz procesor. I have no way
>>>of testing this.
>>>
>>> I know that if I look and see in the description "not tested" I
>>> generally take it to mean tested but did not work.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts on this.
>>>
>>> MJP

Thanks for all the replies and comments, and I thought it was such an
innocuous question.

It has helped in the fact that what may seem clear at the time of writing
may easily be misinterpreted from a different viewpoint.


MJP


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Not tested???
    ... MJP wrote: ... > I have been given a laptop CPU, pentium 4 3.2ghz procesor. ...
    (uk.people.consumers.ebay)
  • Re: Not tested???
    ... >>I have been given a laptop CPU, pentium 4 3.2ghz procesor. ... I think the moral of this story is before jumping in with both feet, re-read ...
    (uk.people.consumers.ebay)
  • Re: Not tested???
    ... > I have been given a laptop CPU, pentium 4 3.2ghz procesor. ... a photo of any distinguishing marks if you do this, ...
    (uk.people.consumers.ebay)
  • Re: Not tested???
    ... > MJP wrote: ... >> I have been given a laptop CPU, pentium 4 3.2ghz procesor. ... I have a socket 478 processor, I do NOT have a socket 478 motherboard. ...
    (uk.people.consumers.ebay)
  • Re: Not tested???
    ... >I have been given a laptop CPU, pentium 4 3.2ghz procesor. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (uk.people.consumers.ebay)