Re: Not tested???
- From: "Partac" <zorbathegreek@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 20:51:28 -0000
"john" <pit@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:PYuDf.65456$zt1.29030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "MJP" <mjpjunk32@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:43de6563$0$59555$892e7fe2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>I have been given a laptop CPU, pentium 4 3.2ghz procesor. I have no way
>>of testing this.
>>
>> I know that if I look and see in the description "not tested" I generally
>> take it to mean tested but did not work.
>>
>> Any thoughts on this.
>>
>> MJP
>>
> I can't believe the lack of common sense sometimes! To test the laptop
> switch it on. To see what processor go into the control panel and have a
> look.
I think the moral of this story is before jumping in with both feet, re-read
the question and see if it still says what you though it did!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Not tested???
- From: MJP
- Re: Not tested???
- References:
- Not tested???
- From: MJP
- Re: Not tested???
- From: john
- Not tested???
- Prev by Date: Re: Not tested???
- Next by Date: Re: Not tested???
- Previous by thread: Re: Not tested???
- Next by thread: Re: Not tested???
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
