Re: Is this legal?
- From: "reg" <reg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 18:36:46 +0100
"Rob Morley" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:MPG.1dcdbba59c76cea7989b5c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <dk099f$t5r$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, reg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> says...
> >
> > "Rob Morley" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:MPG.1dcdb3ee5ec07cdf989b5b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > In article <MPG.1dcda67ed0d0b1f3989fef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > > MooCow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
> > > > Rob Morley [nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxx] said
> > > > > In article <MPG.1dccec5464a26060989fed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > > > > MooCow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
> > > > > > John [John@xxxxxxxxxxx] said
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > When a page needs an unnecessary amount of scrolling to reveal
> > > > > > > information that could have been displayed in a few inches,
then
> > alarm
> > > > > > > bells should ring. Sometimes just bad page design but, as
often
> > as
> > > > > > > not, there's something dodgy right at the bottom a vendor
hopes
> > you
> > > > > > > can't be bothered to find your way to.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Given that a buyer should read every word of a listing before
> > bidding,
> > > > > > at what point can one class the amount of scrolling required to
be
> > > > > > unnecessary?
> > > > > >
> > > > > As the item description forms a part of the contract, I imagine
the
> > > > > Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 might have something to say about
it.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > After a quick scout through a couple of web sites and I would say
not as
> > > > the act seems to be about the reasonableness of a contract's
contents
> > > > rather than their length.
> > > >
> > > And you think it's reasonable to say something is new at the top, then
> > > to say that it's not new at the bottom?
> >
> > ALL OUR CAMERAS ARE FACTORY REFURBISHED AS NEW WITH 6 MONTHS WARRANTY-
WE DO
> > NOT SELL SECOND HAND ITEMS
> >
> No need to shout.
yeah i know, thats what you get when you cut & paste something.
.
- References:
- Is this legal?
- From: Wayner
- Re: Is this legal?
- From: MooCow
- Re: Is this legal?
- From: MooCow
- Is this legal?
- Prev by Date: Re: Undeserved neg
- Next by Date: Re: After last night's programme, eBay is now caught in the headlights
- Previous by thread: Re: Is this legal?
- Next by thread: Re: Is this legal?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading