Re: Damaged and (very) delayed in transit
- From: MooCow <MooCow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:14:21 +0100
Rob Morley [nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxx] said
> In article <MPG.1d50ec478452ff409899e1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "MooCow"
> MooCow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
> <snip>
> >
> > You are calling the OP cheap because his package got caught in the
> > machinery?
> >
> Whatever gave you that idea?
>
"Maybe you'll pay for airmail next time without begrudging the extra
cost."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Damaged and (very) delayed in transit
- From: Rob Morley
- Re: Damaged and (very) delayed in transit
- References:
- Damaged and (very) delayed in transit
- From: Tim Forcer
- Re: Damaged and (very) delayed in transit
- From: Rob Morley
- Re: Damaged and (very) delayed in transit
- From: MooCow
- Re: Damaged and (very) delayed in transit
- From: Rob Morley
- Damaged and (very) delayed in transit
- Prev by Date: Re: American Buyer and Payment
- Next by Date: Re: Lost parcel compensation
- Previous by thread: Re: Damaged and (very) delayed in transit
- Next by thread: Re: Damaged and (very) delayed in transit
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|