Re: People whose publicly-funded websites should be better: part 56



On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 12:55:33 +0100, Andy Mabbett put finger to keyboard
and typed:


Grrr!

<http://www.englandpast.net/oxon/main.html>

Oxfordshire Online

Development project material made available thanks to funding
from the Heritage Lottery Fund

Use the menu on the left to browse the texts available

Please note that these texts are only available to those using
Internet Explorer 5+

And their explanation of why it's IE only is a hoot:

Most of this website has been written in a relatively new technology
called XML. At present, only Internet Explorer 5.0+ supports this
technology, so Netscape users, Opera users and users of other
browsers will not be able to view the texts.

Actually, it works fine in wget and is readable in Lynx (which simply
treats it as a text file). The reason it doesn't work in Firefox has
nothing to do with the fact that Firefox can't read XML, it's because
it isn't actually valid XML in the first place.

Mark
--
Please give me one! http://www.pleasegivemeone.com
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: There has to be a better way to develop web applications.
    ... As for XML overhead - I think you have have needed to come through the "flat ... the navigation has absolutely-no-idea what is going on in the other frames. ... you say it's a pipedream to use ASP.NET and the .NET Framework to ... >> languages and technology, then web application development is never going ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: A fossil makes a statement
    ... > IBM's competitors are also hard at work on technology to query varied data ... BEA Systems last year released its Liquid Data for ... > make it easier for the database to manipulate XML data in different data ... So the Server is still the essential key. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Your Guru Paul Graham is getting trashed on Slashdot.
    ... I care not to refute ... Let's take a simple example - your comments on XML. ... like any technology, has "goods" and "bads", but I think your comments are ... common goal with your website. ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: Web vs Desktop Applications (again)
    ... What was interesting was that their application UI was completely defined in XML using technologies like XML Events and CSS + other XML buzzy things. ... Similarly callbacks were also defined in the XML and they called out to application smalltalk code. ... If you do this you still want to version your "code" like other smalltalk code and find senders/implementors etc so it opens up a huge can of worms... ... is it worth all of this - or is it just "techno-wank" (thats uk for technology for technology sake). ...
    (comp.lang.smalltalk.dolphin)
  • Re: Your Guru Paul Graham is getting trashed on Slashdot.
    ... I care not to refute ... Let's take a simple example - your comments on XML. ... like any technology, has "goods" and "bads", but I think your comments are ... common goal with your website. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)

Loading