Re: OT: Linux question
- From: Richard Watson <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 Aug 2005 11:49:38 +0100
Andy Jacobs <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 18/8/05 10:37 am, in article
> 1124357853.307519.301350@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Richie Hindle"
> <richie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Seconded. I've set this up myself and it's not easy. Andy, I don't
> > think I can help with your Linux problem, but you have my sympathy.
>
> <snip>
>
> Thanks for that. I've found quite a bit about this and the general
> consensus out there seems to be that it's crap.
This is generally the case when people try to provide binaries built
against a moving target.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Linux question
- From: Andy Jacobs
- Re: OT: Linux question
- References:
- OT: Linux question
- From: Andy Jacobs
- Re: OT: Linux question
- From: Richie Hindle
- Re: OT: Linux question
- From: Andy Jacobs
- OT: Linux question
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Linux question
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Linux question
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Linux question
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Linux question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|