Re: RFD: create unmoderated newsgroup uk.local.worcestershire
- From: Dave Fawthrop <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 12:31:11 +0000
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 21:26:52 +0000, SGS <sgs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| In article <rfd1-uk.local.worcestershire-20060103182119$1b6e@xxxxxxxxxxx
| t> posted on Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Richard Bird <sailorsam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| wrote:
| > REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)
| >
| >This is a formal Request For Discussion (RFD) for the following changes
| >in the uk.* Usenet hierarchy:
| Best of luck, but given that 99.99% of postings in
| uk.local.herefordshire are total dross, mostly from outside, I think you
| will be disappointed.
uk.local.yorkshire,moderated is quite good with little dross, you may
like to consider that type of newsgroup. *note the unusual moderation
scheme with no moderation on content.
--
Dave Fawthrop <dave hyphenologist co uk>
17,000 free e-books at Project Gutenberg! http://www.gutenberg.net
For Yorkshire Dialect go to www.hyphenologist.co.uk/songs/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFD: create unmoderated newsgroup uk.local.worcestershire
- From: Andrew Hodgson
- Re: RFD: create unmoderated newsgroup uk.local.worcestershire
- From: Ebb Chernobyl
- Re: RFD: create unmoderated newsgroup uk.local.worcestershire
- Prev by Date: Re: uk.binaries.*
- Next by Date: Re: RFD: create unmoderated newsgroup uk.local.worcestershire
- Previous by thread: Summary of posts to uk.net.news.announce for week ending 2 Jan
- Next by thread: Re: RFD: create unmoderated newsgroup uk.local.worcestershire
- Index(es):