Re: uk.binaries.*
- From: "Tyke" <tyke@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 10:15:16 +1030
In news:MPG.1e22347d4850b71298aa72@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Krustov <krusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> typed:
> <uk.net.news.config , fred , fredc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <20060101.1829.14780snz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <Sun, 01 Jan 2006 18:29:50 +0000 (GMT)>
>
>>> If one of the arguments that nobody creates any new uk.* newsgroups
>>> these days is because any text group wanted is already created and
>>> already available - then doesnt logic say it really is time to add
>>> uk.binaries.* to the uk.* hierarchy .
>>
>> It isn't. The argument is that it isn't worth creating groups for
>> arseholes like you to wreck.
>>
>
> You like some others on here know fine well i'm a good guy these days
> .
>
> Yet you continue to say stuff like the above in full knowledge .
Suprised to see Fred's copmments - he really is starting to sound like the
miserable old sod in the corner of the pub.
--
Tyke
Luck is when the paths of opportunity and preparation cross.
.
- References:
- uk.binaries.*
- From: Krustov
- Re: uk.binaries.*
- From: fred
- uk.binaries.*
- Prev by Date: Re: uk.binaries.*
- Next by Date: Re: uk.binaries.*
- Previous by thread: Re: uk.binaries.*
- Next by thread: Re: uk.binaries.*
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|