Re: windows server 2003

On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:58:26 +0000, Thomas Lee
<tfl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> That problem should now be at an end - the .NET Framework has RTM's and

Shouldn't there be an F in 'RTM'? There usually is <g>...

(One should always RTM with or without an F -- when all else fails, of
course...)

Chris C
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Convert vb from VS2003 to VS2005: Framework 1.0 missing???!!
    ... I setup on a brand new PC XP + SP2 ... PC Net Framework 1.1 ... Now the app is converted. ... > VS2005 RTM? ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.compactframework)
  • [MSH] Installing latest beta - 1st time experience poor
    ... I've finally gotten around to updating my laptop to .NET Framework 2.0 RTM, and the updated drop of Monad. ... If there is a need to have all this security crud, then fix the setup routine, or have a 1st time OOBE wizard. ... The current user experience is just plain poor and IMHO, not acceptable, and needs to be much improved for RTM. ... Thomas Lee ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.scripting)
  • Re: Problem with excessive edb*.log files
    ... I dont know what build you're on (I hope you're still not on w2k RTM) ... Prev by Date: ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory)
  • Re: New drop, please?
    ... RTM of CLR is 50727, so I doubt that these bits will work. ... The x86 build mentioned above is of a later date and supposedly ... Verify that you have the correct version of the .NET Framework, ... If you have this sub-directory, right click on a DLL in this directory ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.scripting)
  • Re: installing release version
    ... > the beta version of .net framework 2.0. ... After that, just install the new ... > RTM version of .net framework 2.0 and check the IIS to see whether it is ... If aspx files stop working on IIS after the uninstall, ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)