Re: windows server 2003
- From: Molly Mockford <nospamnobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 22:05:13 +0000
At 21:36:10 on Fri, 18 Nov 2005, Peter Parry <peter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in <sqhsn19jmh1sce1bh63epeoho6fuo9vq6p@xxxxxxx>:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 22:54:41 -0000, "Ali Hopkins" <fn62@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Peter Parry" <peter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:tlspn1pjvvdmp9dc9hivfm0edcs0i025fq@xxxxxxxxxxOn Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:55:35 +0000, Molly Mockford <nospamnobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Wow, Thomas, I can see why you're an MVP!
MVP? Microsoft Virtual Poodle?
No need to be insulting, shirley.
Shirley is out on the town but what exactly is an MVP? I presume it is some form of Microsoft marketing gibberspeak and therefore of no actual value but what is it supposed to be? A Microsoft Vacuous Proponent? Microsoft Vain and Pompous? Microsoft Voluntary Preacher? Microsoft Vulpine Promoter?
It's a Most Valued Professional - see <http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/mvpexecsum>. They can be extremely useful in newsgroups in situations where one is obliged to do something with a particular piece of MS software (e.g. *vomit* Visual Basic) and naturally one hasn't the first idea how to go about it. Most of them aren't even paid by M$. I think Thomas is, though. <https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/communities/mvplist.aspx?Product=Windo
ws+Server+-+Admin+Frameworks> - although it could be another TL, because I have to say that the photo doesn't look anything like the last photo I saw of Thomas, in the embrace of Steve Ballmer. Also <http://www.mvps.org/links.html#WindowsNT>.
--
Molly
I don't speak for the Committee. If I ever do, it will be made
specifically clear.
My Reply-To address *is* valid, though may not be so for ever.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: windows server 2003
- From: Chris Croughton
- Re: windows server 2003
- From: Peter Parry
- Re: windows server 2003
- From: Thomas Lee
- Re: windows server 2003
- References:
- Re: windows server 2003
- From: Thomas Lee
- Re: windows server 2003
- From: Molly Mockford
- Re: windows server 2003
- From: Peter Parry
- Re: windows server 2003
- From: Ali Hopkins
- Re: windows server 2003
- From: Peter Parry
- Re: windows server 2003
- Prev by Date: Re: windows server 2003
- Next by Date: Re: windows server 2003
- Previous by thread: Re: windows server 2003
- Next by thread: Re: windows server 2003
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|