Re: Low Traffic Groups for Jan - Oct 2005
- From: "West Stand Bowler" <Newmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 18:04:53 -0000
"Chris Croughton" <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:slrndn9buq.4pb.chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Actually, what 'state' has it actually got into? OK, it's always been
> hard to create groups there, but in general those that do get created
> seem to be fairly successful. I've certainly had no problem finding
> groups in the Big8 in which I am interested. Of course, altnet is a
> different matter (and I don't touch the free.* sewer)...
Not all of free.* is a sewer Chris.
Free.uk still serves a purpose for users who couldn't get a uk group.
--
WSB
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Low Traffic Groups for Jan - Oct 2005
- From: Jaques d'Alltrades
- Re: Low Traffic Groups for Jan - Oct 2005
- From: Geoff Berrow
- Re: Low Traffic Groups for Jan - Oct 2005
- References:
- Low Traffic Groups for Jan - Oct 2005
- From: Graham Drabble
- Re: Low Traffic Groups for Jan - Oct 2005
- From: Wm...
- Re: Low Traffic Groups for Jan - Oct 2005
- From: Dr John Stockton
- Re: Low Traffic Groups for Jan - Oct 2005
- From: Wm...
- Re: Low Traffic Groups for Jan - Oct 2005
- From: Dr John Stockton
- Re: Low Traffic Groups for Jan - Oct 2005
- From: Chris Croughton
- Re: Low Traffic Groups for Jan - Oct 2005
- From: Ali Hopkins
- Re: Low Traffic Groups for Jan - Oct 2005
- From: Chris Croughton
- Low Traffic Groups for Jan - Oct 2005
- Prev by Date: Re: Low Traffic Groups for Jan - Oct 2005
- Next by Date: Re: Low Traffic Groups for Jan - Oct 2005
- Previous by thread: Re: Low Traffic Groups for Jan - Oct 2005
- Next by thread: Re: Low Traffic Groups for Jan - Oct 2005
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|