Re: Low Traffic Groups for Jan - Oct 2005
- From: Graham Drabble <usenet05@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:14:12 GMT
On 06 Nov 2005 "West Stand Bowler" <Newmanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
in news:dkkmja$hr9$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>
> "Graham Drabble" <usenet05@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:Xns9703ECFF3B883grahamdrabblelineone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>> Below is a list of groups that had <70 posts during the first 10
>> months
>> of the year.
>
> Who sets the <70 benchmark?
Me. I aim to work on <100 / year as that seems to me to indicate that
it might be worth looking at a group to see if something needs to be
done. I currently only have 10 months worth of data though.
Note that being on that list doesn't mean that something does need to
be done and that being off of it doesn't mean that something doesn't
however in my opinion it gives a reasonable indication of what's likely
to be worth looking at. If you would rather see a different number then
let me know and I'll email you the data.
--
Graham Drabble
http://www.drabble.me.uk/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Low Traffic Groups for Jan - Oct 2005
- From: West Stand Bowler
- Re: Low Traffic Groups for Jan - Oct 2005
- References:
- Low Traffic Groups for Jan - Oct 2005
- From: Graham Drabble
- Re: Low Traffic Groups for Jan - Oct 2005
- From: West Stand Bowler
- Low Traffic Groups for Jan - Oct 2005
- Prev by Date: Re: Low Traffic Groups for Jan - Oct 2005
- Next by Date: Re: Low Traffic Groups for Jan - Oct 2005
- Previous by thread: Re: Low Traffic Groups for Jan - Oct 2005
- Next by thread: Re: Low Traffic Groups for Jan - Oct 2005
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
