Re: Why so many relics
- From: stanb45@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Stan Barr)
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:19:39 -0500
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:34:07 +0100, Woody <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[RE: Tele]
but Leo's original was much
cruder in concept, artistically.
Do you have a picture of that? i cant see anything on the web at a brief
look.
Not in a form I can post on the web, but there was a photo of a prototype
in "Guitarist" Summer edition as part of an exhibition of rare and expensive
guitars (3 million dollars worth!) organised by Paul Reed Smith.
Being prior to Gretsch's objections to the name, it was called the Broadcaster,
try googling for that.
--
Cheers,
Stan Barr stanb .at. dial .dot. pipex .dot. com
(Remove any digits from the addresses when mailing me.)
The future was never like this!
.
- References:
- Why so many relics
- From: Woody
- Re: Why so many relics
- From: nosferatu
- Re: Why so many relics
- From: Woody
- Re: Why so many relics
- From: Stan Barr
- Re: Why so many relics
- From: Woody
- Why so many relics
- Prev by Date: Re: Recording Acoustic Guitar
- Next by Date: Re: Why so many relics
- Previous by thread: Re: Why so many relics
- Next by thread: Re: Why so many relics
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|