Re: music popularity experiment
- From: Ian Burdon <ian.burdon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:25:10 GMT
Not at all: although I should recognise straight away that the link is to a secondary source and this may misrepresent the primary research. On the face of the report, the first group selected their favourites based upon a positive reaction to what they heard thus giving a measure of 'quality'. We do not know the selection criteria of the second group but are led to the inference that their selection was based in whole or in part upon the new variable introduced, namely knowledge of the selections made by the first group.
However, at least as reported, this doesn't give any insight in its own terms into real world behaviours since it is not apparent that there is a community of listeners exercising choice based solely on perception of musical quality which is in any position to influence the choice of the putative second group. Nor does it account for potential distortions in the market caused by operators with a commercial interest in the outcome - such as record companies.
More fundamentally though, since the first group were provided with the names of the artists, there was not, in terms of this report, any control group who's choices were made in the absence of knowledge of the artist. Therefore one cannot, as one of the researchers is reported to claim, state that the choice of 'quality' was made in the absence of social influence since there was no control of the social influence of pre-existing perceptions of the quality attaching to the particular artists within that group. If the report in Live Science is correct (no doubnt a big if), then there appears to be a methodological flaw in the experiment.
It follows that the experiment, as reported, can not be said to measure the effect of peer group influence since there was no control group which effectively removed that influence (assuming that such a thing is possible). One could therefore read the report as saying that songs selected on the basis of peer-group perceptions of quality are chosen on the basis of peer-group perceptions of quality, which is tautologous. Quad Erat Demonstrandum
Cheers
Ian
Jim Lawton wrote:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:50:41 GMT, Ian Burdon.
<ian.burdon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The conclusion was, apparently, that:
"Researchers found that popular songs were popular and unpopular songs were unpopular, [...]. They also found that as a particular songs' popularity increased, participants selected it more often".
Next up in New Tautologist comes research showing that the woods are a popular area for ursine defecation and that the majority of Popes have professed Roman Catholicism as their denomination of choice ;)
I'm sorry - you just snipped that for effect. The experiment was about
peer-group influence :-
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: music popularity experiment
- From: Paul Burke
- Re: music popularity experiment
- References:
- music popularity experiment
- From: Stephen Kellett
- Re: music popularity experiment
- From: Ian Burdon
- Re: music popularity experiment
- From: Jim Lawton
- music popularity experiment
- Prev by Date: Re: music popularity experiment
- Next by Date: Re: music popularity experiment
- Previous by thread: Re: music popularity experiment
- Next by thread: Re: music popularity experiment
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|