Re: self-promotion?

In article <IpJHakH+hAHJFwFw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
In message <MPG.2386042eb75f94fb989cfa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Amethyst
Deceiver <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
In article <dv5wmvTG92GJFwuf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...

I was surprised recently to discover that someone at Wikipedia decided
that my 'Earthsearch' was worthy of a mention

You still don't understand how Wikipedia works, do you?

Good God no! At the time I'd never even heard of the Wikipedia! I'm one
of those pooter illiterates! I use an expert family lawyer firm to find
out such nit-picking details and to threaten to rip miscreants new

You've picked the wrong kind of lawyer there.

assholes if necessary. I've since learned that the Wikipedia's
publishers don't pay their editorial staff! To me, with my finely tuned

NSS! They're not employed.

commercial antennae and even more finely tuned greed antennae, such
behaviour is quite incomprehensible. I refuse to load my word cruncher
unless I'm paid or my work holds the prospect of being paid for. You

So what are you doing here?

wouldn't believe what property companies are prepared to pay for lively,
well-written Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment
access statements that get the deputy prime minister's initial of
approval.

I follow Dr Johnson advice.

Be illiterate?
.

Loading