Re: Those clever people in Redmond.
- From: richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard Tobin)
- Date: 26 Apr 2007 21:31:30 GMT
In article <wwvfy6mkiw8.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Richard Kettlewell <rjk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That's not really a type any more. Analogously, we don't tell
compilers what any given 'int' represents; we tell humans, using its
name, context, documentation, etc.
This is a limitation of most current programming languages.
I refer you to the sig of this 1987 usenet posting:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.amiga/msg/79cd17c635fa3679
-- Richard
--
"Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters
in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963.
.
- References:
- Those clever people in Redmond.
- From: Mary Pegg
- Re: Those clever people in Redmond.
- From: Richard Kettlewell
- Re: Those clever people in Redmond.
- From: Richard Tobin
- Re: Those clever people in Redmond.
- From: Richard Kettlewell
- Those clever people in Redmond.
- Prev by Date: Re: Those clever people in Redmond.
- Next by Date: Re: Those clever people in Redmond.
- Previous by thread: Re: Those clever people in Redmond.
- Next by thread: Re: Those clever people in Redmond.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|