Re: Things which suck
- From: Befunge Sudoku <daviddotbudd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:41:44 +0100
In article <aPm+fwAjl1TDFwcm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
> In message
> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0510132207050.27490@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> om>, Alex Buell <alex.buell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
> >On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Steve Walker wrote:
>
> >> I can't find anything which looks appropriate. Can it selectively
> >>archive email > x years old, do you know?
> >
> >Colour me wrong, Exchange System Manage can't do that. It can only move
> >mailboxes to another server.
> >
> >And again, Outlook can only archive items older than a given date. I
> >think there are third party products that can do that, but what I don't
> >know.
>
> It's pretty much a one-off task (well, two-off, there's another mailbox
> in a similar state). Five years worth of system generated emails Cc'd to
> admin, replies from users, etc. I'd just delete 'em all, but apparently
> they must be kept. I'm only doing it at all because the server is
> running out of disk space. It's a stopgap measure, that server will be
> replaced shortly.
>
>
Forward them all to somewhere easier to deal with
--
Pneumothorax is a word that is long
.
- References:
- Re: Things which suck
- From: Steve Walker
- Re: Things which suck
- From: Steve Walker
- Re: Things which suck
- Prev by Date: Re: Things which suck
- Next by Date: Re: Aston
- Previous by thread: Re: Things which suck
- Next by thread: Re: Things which suck
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading