Re: Torchwood S2E4 - Adam Review with a bit of spoilers
- From: doctor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (The Doctor)
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 12:47:07 +0000 (UTC)
In article <pan.2008.09.12.06.14.43@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Dave Cross <dave@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 12:08:30 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
In article <pan.2008.09.11.05.37.50@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Cross
<dave@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:38:43 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
In article <pan.2008.09.10.05.46.58@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Cross
<dave@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:04:10 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
In article <pan.2008.09.09.05.28.34@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Cross
<dave@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:15:18 +0000, The Doctor wrote:Put it to you this way, if the research goes against the thinking of
In article <pan.2008.09.08.05.26.15@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Cross
<dave@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 12:44:13 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
In article <pan.2008.09.07.07.12.55@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Cross
<dave@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 14:18:11 +0000, The Doctor wrote:The above statement has been brought to you by the politically
In article <pan.2008.09.06.07.00.05@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Cross
<dave@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:17:34 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
In article <pan.2008.09.04.05.50.46@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Cross
<dave@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:27:35 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
I am a declared antihomosexual.
Shouldn't you say that you're anti-homosexuality rather than
anti- homosexual? The popular phrase amongst christians is,
I believe, "love the sinner, hate the sin".
Or have most christians got it wrong in your opinion?
What about mental help?
I have no idea what you're talking about (as usual) but you
seem to be avoiding the question (as usual).
You said that you're "anti-homosexual". I pointed out that
this seems to be unchristian as you're supposed to hate the
sin but love the sinner. So a better description would be
"anti-homosexuality" - i.e. hating the practice but not the
people.
Perhaps you'd like to comment on what I wrote, rather than
taking the discussion off on a random tangent.
And perhaps you'd consider writing a reply that includes more
that half a dozen words. Maybe even a paragraph or two. I'm
sure you'll find that if you're a little more detailed in your
responses then a) more people will understand what you're
talking about and b) fewer people will mark you out as a
troll.
I was asking what about mental help for the homosexual? You
call that love or hate?
I don't know about love or hate, but it's certainly an extremely
offensive concept. Homosexuality is not a mental illness.
correct.
Nope. The above statement has been brought to you by the opinions
of the medical profession. Homosexuality is not a mental disease.
No reasonable person thinks that is it.
Perhaps you could produce some evidence from a peer-reviewed
medical journal that backs up your ridiculous ideas.
All surpressed by political correctness no doubt.
Don't talk bollocks. What you mean is that you can't produce any
evidence.
In my experience, accusations of political correctness are just
meaningless bluster used by people who know they've already lost the
argument.
the day, it gets repressed. That has been happening since time in
memorial.
If you thought about that for even a second, you would realise it's
complete nonsense. If that was true, then medical science would never
advance at all.
Many medical advances are made because someone goes against the
current ways of thinking.
You're talking bollocks again.
Dave...
p.s. And "in memorial"? Did you mean "immemorial"?
Next you will says fetuses are tissue. Lie!
I'm not going to get into that that discussion with you. It would be a
complete waste of everyone's time.
I will, however, note that (once again) you have ignored my point
because you don't have an answer and have attempted to take the
discussion off on a tangent.
You said that if medical research goes against the current ways of
thinking then it will be ignored. I pointed out that this is nonsense as
a lot of advances in medical science are made because someone thinks
outside of the prevalent ideas. You had no answer to that so you tried
to bring abortion into the discussion.
Answer my point or admit that you can't.
To quote " I'm not going to get into that that discussion with you. It
would be a complete waste of everyone's time."
I'll take that as an admission that you can't answer my point.
Thank you.
Dave...
It is an admission of nothing.
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doctor@xxxxxxxxxx Ici doctor@xxxxxxxxxx
God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising! Canada vote anything but
Conservative on 14 OCt 2008, join us at http://www.harpocrit.ca .
.
- References:
- Re: Torchwood S2E4 - Adam Review with a bit of spoilers
- From: Dave Cross
- Re: Torchwood S2E4 - Adam Review with a bit of spoilers
- From: The Doctor
- Re: Torchwood S2E4 - Adam Review with a bit of spoilers
- From: Dave Cross
- Re: Torchwood S2E4 - Adam Review with a bit of spoilers
- Prev by Date: Re: Torchwood S2E4 - Adam Review with a bit of spoilers
- Next by Date: Re: Torchwood S2E4 - Adam Review with a bit of spoilers
- Previous by thread: Re: Torchwood S2E4 - Adam Review with a bit of spoilers
- Next by thread: Re: Torchwood S2E4 - Adam Review with a bit of spoilers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
