Re: Stewart Lee's Show Getting Better

On Mar 31, 1:32 pm, Sofa - Spud dusted off his Crank-O-Crapper (patent
pending) to inflict the following dismal diatribe on the good folk of
UMTM:


It's safe to say barker that any website devoted to the massively
popular Coronation Street is going to be more widely read

What, even an unofficial one that relies upon old-fashioned visual
updates rather than video download? I think not.

and appreciated by the target audience than any of the acres of drivel
you've ever produced or the famous Satirefire website - when's the hard
copy of that coming out then?


It's just one of any irons in the fire, oh Prurient One. Unlike you,
we aren't all one trick ponies.

Be sure of this barker, 300 copies of your drivel bought by people who
seem to appreciate the binding and the pictures *doesn't* make you
popular or talented. It makes you a poseur and supporter of an East
European neo nazi, that's all.


Ah, the mist begins to clear. You're envious, and you want to drag me
down to your level.

Ooh, and let's not forget

that you branded a chinese Ebayer a "slit eyed ***" because he
ripped you off for a few quid, which makes you a racist, and thus a
poor judge of people in general.

No barker it doesn't, it's an off the cuff remark made 5 yrs ago. You'd

It's not an "off the cuff remark". It's a racist remark, pure and
simple.

be *very* well advised to drop all this nonsense branding people racist
for calling your wife a Lithuanian cabbage picker or mail order bride or
the fury you show if someone here described someone on the TV as a Mong
or Retard, because these are just throwaway words on Usenet. But you

Oh dear, now you're trying to excuse racist and sexist remarks as
"throwaway words on Usenet", as if they don't really mean anything.

Offensive language is offensive language whether it be shouted from
the treetops, whispered in private or published on the internet. For
you to now argue that it's acceptable to be racist, sexist or to
disparage the disabled just because it's usenet is quite frankly a
ridiculous argument that no one but a fool would support.

however are now working with and funding a man with links to neo Nazi
Romanian groups who actually write about and advocate deportation of non
white people plus the racial purification of society, they don't want to
care for your sons and their friends at the special school, they want to
make them *go away* permanently. They want to *clean up* the gene pool.


Calm down, dear; take a pill. You're losing it.

Now, you've been asked on more than one occasion to furnish us with
some proof to back up these rabid allegations; you still haven't
provided any. You just rant on endlessly about the Iron Guard and Troy
Southgate and seem incapable of acknowledging that DG was simply a
journalist who was paid to interview TS, just as Louis Theroux was
paid to interview various strange people for the BBC.

Besides, bearing in mind that you have often expressed racist
setiments what with your denigration of east european immigrants, to
say nothing of your excusing Mike Plowman's calling a Chinese person a
"slit eyed ***" as a harmless bit of fun, your own track record on
this front is far from squeaky clean. Indeed, your attempts to smear a
third party as a racist are not ony hypocritical but they are
suspicious. A large number of intelligent, liberal writers are working
with DG on various projects as evidenced on his website, and they
would hardly agree to do so if they shared the same concerns as you.

No, it seems obvious that your nauseatingly hypocritical stance on
this issue is motivated by two less than savoury reasons. Firstly you
are envious, envious because no one would ever dream of publishing
you; and secondly, you want to deter me from working with DG, because
the last thing you want is for one of your eneies to succeed at
something.

Now you can bluff and bluster or flounce - but make a note of this
barker - you are funding this, not spouting off on Usenet but _actually_
funding it.


Utter nonsense. DG is funding the project, not me, and profits he
makes will go towards paying his wages and providing a return for his
backer, an American millionaire who is most definitely _not_ a
supporter of neo-facism.

Don't take my word for it - google it and see for yourself. Don't say
Ghetu is a writer etc etc - the article where he brown noses Troy
Southgate (convicted criminal, founder of the NF in the UK , member of
the Iron Guard) has been around and republished in several places in the
last few years , if he *didn't* support it he'd have withdrawn it. It
features prominently in Synthesis a Nazi website run by Southgate and
full of the *latest* updates on Eugenics.



[Yawn.]

Refer to my earlier comments on this.

[Repeated again out of regard for Sofa Spud's tiny brain.]

To recap, DG was paid as a journalist to interview Southgate, just
like a thousand other journalists are paid to interview rebel leaders,
terrorists, murderers, politicians, extremists etc etc. And even if
you think the interview was not challenging enough, let's not forget
that David Bowie once flirted with facism - giving a Hitler salute
when boarding a train in Berlin - yet no one seriously thinks he is a
Nazi sympathiser.

You're an arch hypocrite, Sofa Spud. You disparaged my disabled
children as cabbages and mongs and referred to my wife as an
illiterate immigrant desperate for a work visa; you've also excused
Mike Plowman's unforgiveably racist attack on a chinese an as a bit of
harmless internet banter. Yet now you want to condemn a professional
journalist simply because he interviewed a right-wing extremist?

You're taking the piss, mate. You can't be quite right in the head.


Somehow I can't see your opinion counting for much on the world stage.

And yours does? I think not barker.


Oh, I think my opinion counts for much more than yours or Plowman's.

I'm not a great fan of Lee's comedy, but he has his supoorters, and
they have far greater credibility than you'll ever have.

supoorters??

It's a bit rich for you to lecture others on matters of spelling or
grammar: your own grasp of the English Language indicates that you
struggled with a CSE in the subject.


Good job Ghetu isn't actually going to read any of the crap you send him
is it?

What nonsense you talk. You make it up as you go along, don't you? DG
brought my project forward by several months because he was so
impressed with the quality of my work.

I'll tell you what: you go write something interesting and find a
publisher who'll use it and then come back to tell us all about it.
Only then will you be able to claim the moral high ground.



.