Re: Another reason to subscribe to HD
- From: Dom Robinson <pickpops@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 18:37:05 -0700 (PDT)
On 9 Mar, 00:38, "Felicity S." <Fliss@orpheusnet> wrote:
MC wrote:
Found a film I wanted to see on CH4 a few nights back and decided to
watch. Started to watch only to find it had the annoying signer in the
corner. A bit peeved I decided to watch anyway but then realised I was
not on the HD channel. I turned to CH4 HD and found that even though the
film was not transmitted in HD it was WITHOUT a signer. Excellent.
Excellent.
Is this the norm for HD channels? If so I have not noticed before.
Is there still a dirty great BBC HD logo on their channel?
On C4, all their HD programming has an HD logo onscreen throughout.
Despite the fact that the announcer/EPG states this beforehand, some
retards in a certain forum once reckoned that the announcer/EPG
sometimes gets it wrong whereas the logo never does (despite all this
coming from the same broadcaster) so they were happy to have the logo.
However, if the point of HD is to have sharper pictures, why affect it
with the cancer of a logo?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Another reason to subscribe to HD
- From: Felicity S.
- Re: Another reason to subscribe to HD
- From: Calum
- Re: Another reason to subscribe to HD
- References:
- Another reason to subscribe to HD
- From: MC
- Re: Another reason to subscribe to HD
- From: Felicity S.
- Another reason to subscribe to HD
- Prev by Date: Re: She's The Man - Ch4, Sunday at 9pm !!???
- Next by Date: Re: RIP Ali Bongo
- Previous by thread: Re: Another reason to subscribe to HD
- Next by thread: Re: Another reason to subscribe to HD
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
