Re: A rather timely documentary on UKTV History today..


"Froot Bat" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:4967e807$0$31158$8a667849@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:32:38 -0000, "michael adams"
<mjadams25@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Froot Bat" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:4966767a$0$31208$8a667849@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 11:13:40 -0000, "michael adams"

You are like a five year old. Read the thread back, FFS. If I can
remember the order things happened, why can't you?

1. You claimed I didn't know what Haganah (or however you spelled it)
was and I had to Google it.
2. Correcting that hapless mistake of yours I even provided a quote
from 2006

It doesn't matter what the date of the original quote was, all that matters is
that you must have used Google to retrieve that quote. And yet when I said
you must have used Google - you called me a liar.

Um, because you said that _before_ - repeat BEFORE - I 'used Google to
retrieve the quote'. Go back and check this thread, dummy, since you
don't appear to be able to remember what you wrote and when.

No.

I even wrote the sequence down for you.

I wrote something.

You queried the spelling

I said you must have googled it to know the spelling. You denied having
done so and in the very next breath admitted you had used google after
all.

So carried away were you with your juicy little fact that the Hagenah
had sunk this ship. So carried away were you with your Patria "scoop"
that you were hoping nobody would notice this was a prime facie admission
you'd used google when you'd just denied having done so - and even called
me a liar for having suggested as much.

As it happens you forget to mention that the Hagenah claimed that their
intention had been to prevent the ship sailing - so that the refugees would
have to be landed rather than sent away again - rather than sink the ship
and drown anyone. A lie by omission this time. I didn't mention it
then because I decided to go through your posts one lie at a time.
So as to try and stop you clouding the issue, and given your google
lie was so blatant.


....


And then in the very next
breath you admit it. Unless that is you carry stuff from 2006 around in
your head.

And what do you carry around in your head? Nothing older than last
week?


....

Not verbatim posts, no. The odd phrase maybe.

You're claiming to have remmbered this post of yours word for word.

Spot the difference ?

....

I can remember stuff I have posted over ten years ago on all kinds of
subjects in all kinds of different groups, so how would I not remember
something I wrote on this very subject (of this thread) in this very
newsgroup a mere two years ago?

....

Word for word ?

You're totally wasting your time posting on NewsGroups then.

Either that or you're a very bad liar.

Prodigous memory - or liar ?

....


On the other hand if I can't produce links to any such posts - where I refer
to Palestine, Ariel Sharon, the Shabra and Shatila massacre etc from 4
or more years ago then I promise to post a similar apology on the NewsGroup
instead .

Where YOU refer? YOU, Mike? YOU? Are you sure? Original posts by YOU?

....

Ah. So now you admit that I was indeed posting on this topic 4 and 5 years ago.

But rather than be a man and admit that you were wrong, and apologise
for lying about me, you then concoct another lie by claiming they weren't
my own work.

What a shabby little worm you are.

But that's easily proved either way. Just take any of these "unattributed
thefts" of mine and run them through google to find where they were "stolen"
from and then give the give the links. What could be simpler ?

As before you won't. As you can't.

....


Or posts where you simply STOLE an article that you happened to find
and passed it off as your own (at least twice) by not crediting the
source and putting your name at the bottom of it?

You have personally written exactly *** ALL about Sabra and Chatila,
and the only thing you have ever personally written about Ariel Sharon
is pathetic drivel making fun of his name and him being unwell.

I post the links, plus quotes, and you apologise and admit you're a dribbling
retard.

No, Mike, a dribbling retard is someone who STEALS an article they
found and posts it to Usenet without any attribution and probably
without even reading it, let alone understanding it, passes it off as
his own thoughts and words and even puts his name at the bottom of it.

....

So leave the link to my post with the unattributed quote, google a distinctive
phrase from the "stolen material" to find out where its from, and leave a link
to the site where you claim I stole it from.

Even a dribbling liar like you should be able to manage that.

Now I've shown you how to do it - how to detect stolen material being
posted on a NewsGroup you can now waste another eight hours of your valuable
time ferreting around vainly trying to demonstrate that I'm a plagiarist.

And then when again you fail, rather than admit you're a filthy little
liar, as here you'll try and change the subject and come up with some
other drivel - another lie.

I can see now why you don't want your posts archived chum. Even if nobody
else can ever find out who you are - you know who you are. And you know
all the crap, drivel, and lies that you've been posting on Usenet for years
now. Even the crap you dredged up in that prodigious memory of yours from
2 years ago about the Patria - and all without using google so you claim -
turns out to be a pile of total bollocks. Doubtless copied from some neo- nazi
website. Lies which credulous dupes like you and your kind lap up with your tongues
hanging out as though it were mannah from heaven.


michael adams

....










.