Re: Is Ophelia AKA Chris Barker?
- From: Sofa - Spud <comfysofas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 19:16:43 +0000
Shrike wrote:
On Dec 31, 4:57 pm, "Bob" <h...@xxxxxx> wrote:Ophelia wrote in uk.food+drink.misc:
I do not normally post on these newsgroups. I have neither the time????- Hide quoted text -
nor the patience for the puerile level of exchange involved, however,
your malevolent language and insinuation has gone beyond the merely
insulting to become defamatory, as is well witnessed and recorded.
My advice to Patricia (Ophelia) is simply to ignore you, but
apparently your harassment is extended over several groups of which
she wishes to be a member and she feels unable to accept such
behaviour without defending herself. It is now affecting her health
and well-being and I will not allow that to continue.
I hereby formally warn you that: Unless you immediately cease and
desist from publishing any public remarks or statements of a personal
and insulting nature about Patricia, myself or our private lives,
beginning Friday of this week I will commence legal action against
you to obtain an injunction to prevent you from continuing such
attacks. Any furtherance thereafter will lend you liable to criminal
charges. In addition, I will also consult our solicitor as to the
possibility of criminal charges under the Post Office Act or other
relevant legislation and have them obtain details of your Internet
Service Provider to either have them remove your account or face
similar action for allowing your offensive behaviour to continue.
I seriously suggest that you think carefully before responding to
this post and do not do so in any hurried or frivolous manner. Nor I
will not respond to any reply unless to accept an agreement for the
end of this spiteful exchange and an undertaking that you will not to
become involved in any of similar nature in future.
In the absence of that or the continuance of his behaviour you will
next hear from our solicitor and/or the police.
Yours sincerely
David Crossley
- Show quoted text -
It's well-reasonned and adult in tone so I can understand your
confusion, 'Bob'. But no, it is not me, it's just another example of a
normal person being maliciously pestered by emotionally-retarded
internet cowards.
"Make cowards accountable for what they say on the internet" - you
wouldn't think it would be a controversial wish. Well, it wouldn't be
in the real world.
You idiot barker - it's a spoof post if you'd look to where it came from.
I can take it then that your comments about Rosie and her disabled daughter ( her being a danger to the daughter etc) should make you accountable then?
It's funny - you're in a right state at the moment, slapped here and there, given a chance to show your vast knowledge and outed as a poseur. Seeing as it's the New Year why don't you bugger off for good - last year you were just the same threatening legal action and private detectives on me - whining about being a victim etc etc. Nothing will change in the next 12months - you won't publish that novel , no one will suddenly think you are an OK guy. Just as in the rest of Usenet and all those specialist forums - they think you are a fruitckae.
Just end it barker - it's for the best!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is Ophelia AKA Chris Barker?
- From: Bob
- Re: Is Ophelia AKA Chris Barker?
- References:
- Is Ophelia AKA Chris Barker?
- From: Bob
- Re: Is Ophelia AKA Chris Barker?
- From: Shrike
- Is Ophelia AKA Chris Barker?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is Ophelia AKA Chris Barker?
- Next by Date: Re: Mel Smith
- Previous by thread: Re: Is Ophelia AKA Chris Barker?
- Next by thread: Re: Is Ophelia AKA Chris Barker?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|