Re: The Ross saga
- From: Sofa - Spud <comfysofas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:52:34 +0000
Alan Hope wrote:
Sofa - Spud goes:
I think the Daily Mail is credited with far more power than they actually have.
All they did in this was make a couple of cannonballs. It was the
Great British Public wot fired them all. The Daily Mail simply knows a
good outrage story when it sees one, and it knows it only has to light
the blue touch-paper and its readers will go off on one all by
themselves. This one had it all: a doddering old gent who's a comedy
legend; a lingering dislike of Ross and distrust of the sleazeball
Brand; discontent at the amount of money they make; and the apparent
impunity big stars feel when interacting with the hoi polloi. That is,
you and me, or the Daily Mail's own readers more exactly.
Funny!!
*hoi polloi* isn't there some debate about using *the* to precede it?
.
- References:
- Re: The Ross saga
- From: Mark a
- Re: The Ross saga
- From: pete
- Re: The Ross saga
- From: michael adams
- Re: The Ross saga
- From: Sofa - Spud
- Re: The Ross saga
- From: Alan Hope
- Re: The Ross saga
- Prev by Date: Re: The Ross saga
- Next by Date: Re: Ross suspended w/o pay for 12 weeks
- Previous by thread: Re: The Ross saga
- Next by thread: Re: The Ross saga
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|