Re: The Ross saga
- From: Alan Hope <usenet.identity@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:49:22 +0100
Sir Krustov goes:
<uk.media.tv.misc>
<AC>
<Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:42:35 -0000>
<97***.39386$7q6.1133@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Right, so had the BBC news ignored Ross and Brand, that would have caused no
criticism what so ever.
Steve Penk just gave ross a right good verbal thrashing on sky news .
He said that he hoped he was proud of himself as a good woman lost her
job because of him - and that she carried the can for his mistake .
A fair point ? .
She was guilty as charged. It's unfair if she loses her job and Ross
doesn't, though. He was far more culpable than anyone else involved.
--
AH
http://grapes2dot0.blogspot.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Ross saga
- From: michael adams
- Re: The Ross saga
- References:
- Re: The Ross saga
- From: Mark a
- Re: The Ross saga
- From: pete
- Re: The Ross saga
- From: AC
- Re: The Ross saga
- From: Sir Krustov
- Re: The Ross saga
- Prev by Date: Re: Dead Set - cracking good fun!
- Next by Date: Re: The Ross saga
- Previous by thread: Re: The Ross saga
- Next by thread: Re: The Ross saga
- Index(es):