Re: Ross/Brand/Sachs

The Fox In The Chicken House wrote:
On Oct 30, 8:20 am, Alan Hope <usenet.ident...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Froot Bat goes:

LOL Stick to your own league, fatboy. Barker is over there. It's at
least 5 minutes since you last cried about that email he sent about 25
years ago.
Keep sucking up to him and there's a chance it may never happen to
you. Only a small chance, mind. He's a bit erratic.

--
AHhttp://grapes2dot0.blogspot.com

I've made this observation before and I'll make it again.

One of the characteristics which defines your behaviour as childish
and dictatorial is your delusion that all issues are black and white,
with no grey area in between.


OH the irony ...............

Thus everybody must be either on your
side or against you, regardless of the issue. Now, as soon as anyone
opposes you, or expresses an opinion on any subject which might
overlap with that held by a perceived enemy, you immediately attack
them. You're like

Oh gawd here we go

that little starship in the game Asteroids, blitzing
every rock or asteroid which comes within your line of vision.

A handful of people have at different times expressed opinions which
accord with my own i.e. Daniel Lincoln, Mary,

Mary doesn't count barker - two posts saying *you're all jealous of mr barker** just won't do.

Col, CP and now -
apparently - Froot Bat (though I think he holds his own opinions, not
simply derivatives of mine).

Be sure of this barker - no body with a full set of brain cells holds opinions like yours.

What has been your reaction, Hope? Have
you humbly respected their right to hold opinions which differ to your
own, or have you flown in like Grendel, threatening to tear people's
heads off, accusing them of being no better than someone you clearly
enjot demonising?

Oh ffs barker


For all your swagger, Hope, you are probably the stupidest person in
this group. You constantly push the boundaries in terms of being
offensive and aggressive, all the while knowing that you are
incredibly vulnerable on the job front.

Oh? you said he was sacked the other day - when he isn't , so either they've made a mistake by keeping him employed or you are a liar. Which is it I wonder?

It's almost like you have a
death-wish. Yes, in a pleasant and gentle world, no one would dream of
trying to stir up trouble for someone with their employer

No one would dream of doing it anyway barker - only you, No one would dream of getting involved with peoples personal lives by contacting their MP but you did.

, but people
like you make it far from pleasant and gentle.


People like Barker you mean - oh that's you isn't it? the reason why nobody should ever divulge any personal information about themselves because one day you'll be having a strop and decide to make trouble.

Your a loon barker - face it and get help or jump under the train , either way it's a win win for everyone.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Yet another question/problem with abs...
    ... Thanks to everyone for the opinions. ... keeping down food. ... To make a long story short, I now have no trouble ... gentleman who offered the clever advice of "lift weights and eat ...
    (misc.fitness.weights)
  • Re: Killing kids and wemen???
    ... since no opinions will be changed. ... the trouble to write a modest comment on your posting. ... effectively short circuiting any replies. ... really want to be considered a twerp? ...
    (comp.sys.acorn.hardware)
  • Re: IE is displaying incorrect URL
    ... not worth the trouble, we have dessenting ... opinions... ... intelligence is a tool of the arrogant! ...
    (microsoft.public.security)
  • Re: Contraband "hacking tool" Executables
    ... methodology is IMHO flawed. ... known clean files and ... my opinions may be skewed by virtue of my employer. ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • Re: Block Non-SolidWorks Content
    ... Impressive Googling to find an old employer! ... occasionally bother to express opinions on this NG, though, particularly ... > TriMech Solutions, LLC Corporate Headquarters ...
    (comp.cad.solidworks)