Re: Steve Coogan fans walk out of 'shambolic' stand-up comeback

Saviour Machine goes:

On Oct 22, 9:10 pm, Alan Hope <usenet.ident...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Saviour Machine goes:

You've
swaggered about playing to your tiny audience on more than one
occasion - doubting that money I raised for a kiddies hospital ever
reached the intended party, and claiming that I lied about knowing
some poor chap who killed himself on a level crossing - and what was
your reaction then when I handed you proof on a plate?

You've never proved either of those claims. All you do is offer a
third party who may be contacted,  if anyone is Barmy enough to go
writing to perfect strangers to settle Usenet arguments.

No, you're not telling the truth. Again.

In one case I directed Lawrence to the EACH website and invited him to
drop them a quick email to ask whether money raised from an Ebay
auction ever reached them.

So you didn't provide proof. As I said.

He bottled out. He ran sobbing back to his
band of bullies and hid behind them, shaking an angry fist at me.

The only person who thinks it's normal to contact total strangers
offline in order to settle a Usenet dispute is you, nutcase.

In the other case, I invited him to search for contact details for the
employer who employed the young lad who killed himself, and warned the
owner that Lawrence might be contacting him (he said he'd be happy to
confirm the matter despite it being malicious internet nonsense).

So by your own admission, you offered the name and address of a
bereaved family so that the hordes of invisible posters to UMTM could
call them up and ask them questions about their dead son.

What a great guy you are.

Again, not a sign of any proof provided by you. Only an invitation to
contact a third party offline, for which see above.

Again, Lawrence bottled it, and instead stooped to making nasty jokes
about a deceased person who died tragically.

Is it better to make jokes where nobody will see them, or invite the
whole world to contact the bereveaved relatives directly?

As I said, Lawrence is an odious little man. And you are too. I can't
provide factual proof of that but your posts are good enough to be
going on with.

And you're a liar. So that takes care of that.


--
AH
http://grapes2dot0.blogspot.com
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: DS Supreme Under Glass a la Gelatain
    ... employer no longer has to match as SS and can thus give to you in the ... capitalist pig just pocket that money himself? ... proposal is going to have young people smothering older folks in their ... My parents both died relatively shortly after they started collecting ...
    (rec.arts.comics.strips)
  • Re: OT - Obama plays the race card
    ... The people of this village no longer have the rights to fish ... order to earn money so that they can exchange it for food and goods. ... It's fun to have power over others. ... employer not only in the USA, ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: OT - Canada leads where it counts
    ... your employers money and the insurance companies money. ... If you are paying say $200 per month, your employer is most ... contributing visa-vis health insurance exceeds their estimate, ... It appears that your plan is not %100, but many old-timers who grew up ...
    (rec.music.makers.guitar.jazz)
  • Re: OT. Grab your wallets, here come the Dems
    ... Tell me again how it is that reducing the amount of income my employer ... has is likely to increase the amount of money I will have? ... transaction, and inventing new, questionable and obscure transactions ...
    (rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: SMS premium rate spam from 78181 (Orange UK)
    ... third party wants to bill me they should prove that they are entitled to ... If they want to bill you it should up the third party to prove ... to get their money back for something that they were not a party to the ... SMS scams are the one reason I'll never switch to PAYG even though it ...
    (uk.telecom.mobile)