Re: OT: Kill File Bullshitters
- From: Saviour Machine <hauntedriver@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 02:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
On 18 Sep, 07:11, Alan Hope <usenet.ident...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Moon Squirter goes:
On 17 Sep, 10:02, Saviour Machine <hauntedri...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Is it just me, or does UMTM have an inordinate number of self-styledI suppose your life is so "empty and meaningless" that you feel the
computer experts who keep yakking on about kill files but fail to use
one themselves?
.. ...
I think we should pity them.
need to COMPLAIN about such trivial things as people discussing their
killfiles, who themselves are COMPLAINING about other people, who in
turn are COMPLAINING about other people. And so the winging goes on.
You've joined the ranks!
Barker is feeling starved of attention again, so he starts a new
thread on a "controversial" topic to get some. If that doesn't work,
he'll up the ante, until before you know it he's off stalking people
in real life again.
That's what he does, you see. Feel free to do a Google Groups search
for "creepy stalker" and Barker/Barmy/Barkingmad for more information.
--
AHhttp://grapes2dot0.blogspot.com
Wrong again, Hopeless. "Mr" Barker posts elsewhere in the group,
whereupon your girlfriends immediately rattle their handbags and start
gossiping. Rather than respond to each of their pathetic bleats for
attention, I economically start a new thread, pointing out the very
obvious contradiction in their a) claiming to find my posts
uninteresting, and b) their responding volubly to each of those posts
they claim to find uninteresting.
There's a curious pattern emerging here. A hardcore section of you not
only contribute towards a revisionist history, but it's becoming
increasingly clear that you actually believe the rewrites you peddle.
This is odd because even in his most deluded moments, I am quite sure
that Tony Blair knows he lied about WMD. Some people - politicians and
celebrities mostly - regularly distort the truth as part of a survival
technique, but they know they do, and they know we know. Hence the coy
smile on Michael Howard's face when he was being grilled by Jeremy
Paxman in that famous interview. There is often a tacit, unstated
acknowledgement on both sides that the truth is not being told, but
ever so slightly smudged and distorted by way of saving face or making
capital. Yet in UMTM a small element not only want to pull the wool
over people's eyes, but to argue that they never did so, and to then
heap new lie upon new distortion. If it were as part of some amusing
and engaging parlour game this would be perfectly acceptable, but alas
you egotsists are in deadly earnest, so it can be little but blatant
bullying, akin to totalitarian tactics.
The way that you crow about non-existent great victories over me or
indeed others recalls to mind the Party's claims in "1984". Then
there's the damning hypocrisy, such as Jeff Lawrence's unfalltering
habit of making wild allegations but running for cover when offered
real, actual evidence, or Plowman's oddly effeminate tittering along
to jokes about disabled children but suddenly getting serious and
angry when a joke about pie-eating is made in reference to his wife.
This is to say nothing of wilful distortion in which you collectively
exaggerate anything I may say or do while playing-down your own
behaviour as unimportant. Thus you strive to create a pathetic little
universe in which I am, ridiculously, castigated for using the word
"dribbling", but where you then turn a blind eye when others use terms
such as "dribbling retard" or make inappropriate "vegetable" jokes.
Arguably the biggest contradiction involves your extremely dubious
claim that I am responsible for your actions. I don't think anyone
agrees with you beyond those affected by the same delusion. No, if you
and your girlfriends trot about at my heels sniping at my every post,
then it is you who are obsessed with seeking attention.
Please don't mistake this post as an attempt to convert you, or as an
appeal to your better nature. It's perfectly clear to me that you are,
to use a proper medical term, an "utter twat", and that you suffer
from delusions of self-importance. No, I'm posting just to point out
to the hundreds of other non-posting subscibers that you are an "utter
twat", and that - to coin another useful medical term - you talk
"bollocks". Well, that's not entirely true: I'm also doing it to
remind you that I can see perfectly clearly through the smoke and
mirrors that you rush about creating by way of argument.
Any pleasure that I derive from cutting you down to size is purely
coincidental. Besides, it's wrong to make fun of an "utter twat" who
talks "bollocks". You need help, either medical or spiritual.
NOTE: For the purposes of economy, the sad little UMTM hardcore of
malcontents should assume this post refers to them also. I can't be
doing with replying to each of you personally - much as you crave it -
but alas you are far too boring. Not only do you fail to move on with
things in generally, but you are tediously predictable, and
collectively bereft of wit. Indeed, it can be no coincidence that you
count none of the genuinely funny UMTMers amongst your numbers.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Kill File Bullshitters
- From: Sofa - Spud
- Re: OT: Kill File Bullshitters
- From: Alan Hope
- Re: OT: Kill File Bullshitters
- From: Mike Plowman
- Re: OT: Kill File Bullshitters
- References:
- OT: Kill File Bullshitters
- From: Saviour Machine
- Re: OT: Kill File Bullshitters
- From: Moon Squirter
- Re: OT: Kill File Bullshitters
- From: Alan Hope
- OT: Kill File Bullshitters
- Prev by Date: Re: voyager and tng
- Next by Date: Today's "no ***, sherlock". Texting more dangerous than drinking while driving
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Kill File Bullshitters
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Kill File Bullshitters
- Index(es):
Loading