Re: Any Dickens fans?

On 19 Jun, 13:29, Sofa - Spud <comfyso...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Actually, I think you have deep-seated problems.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obsessive-compulsive_disorder

So you go ballistic when someone calls someone else a mong but now you
say I have a mental illness.

They're two different things entirely. One is a term of abuse, the
other is a a possible diagnosis.

And all because I won't let you forget that
you tried to interfere with peoples lives in the real world?

No, because you spend so many hate-filled hours of your life reminding
me of something that I already know and that I really couldn't care a
less about i.e. that you dislike me. And you do so in such a strangely
repetitive way, like a cockerel breaking out into crowing everytime it
sees the sun.



You once mentioned seeing a child killed. Did you ever have therapy?

http://groups.google.com/group/uk.media.tv.misc/msg/f137620f3b72a76c?...

Your attempts to keep long dead arguments alive by obsessively
perputuating them in usenet could be linked to your never having come
to terms with such a traumatic experience. I'm not saying this to
score points, I'm saying it because I think that, just like Alan Hope
and Mike Plowman, you sometimes appear unable to move on with things.

Are you for real? What on earth must you have put in the search box to
find that? What a strange loon you are, I note too that you don't mind
the archive when it suits you.


That's a bit evasive. If I'd witnessed something like that, I'd have
been distressed, and would readily own up to the fact.

What you don't like is that everyone on here is going to be always
reminded of what you are like, they'll be shown links and invited to
look and make their own mind up.


Don't flatter yourself. You are trying to justify obsessive internet
behaviour as an honorable public service, always talking about
"everyone" as though you have their invisible support. Yet it nearly
always come down to 95% of the regular posters ignoring you and your
rants. What's more, you've recently seen for yourself people
discussing the fact that they find arguments like you keep on
perpetuating boring and tiresome because those left standing just keep
on regurtitating the same thing, again and again.

I couldn't give a monkey's about you. It's your reputation after all.
You go on "reminding everyone" just how much you hate me with the same
old tired arguments. They'll make their own minds up about things
(that's one valid cliche about British people - they don't half resent
being told what to do and how to think).

You know what they'll think don't you?

That you are a nutcase and to be avoided .



Sure, whatever you think. But as I've said before to Plowman or
Hopeless, most people couldn't care a less about other people's
arguments, and instead judge them on how they well they get on with
them themselves, aor on how interesting they find them as a person via
their posts. I think that both you and I know that I get on well with
most people in UMTM which is why if I post something interesting I
will almost always get a positive reply.

This must really get up your nose, hence the obsessive and quite
frankly pathetic attempt to incite ill-feeling against me. What's
more, although you claim to be on a quest for the invisible majority,
your claim that I am "a nutcase...to be avoided" doesn't exactly sit
comfortably alongside your obsession with me. You can't avoid me
yourself. If you could, you would, hence the diagnosis of an
obsession. For example, I start a thread about the rising costs of
petrol, you leap all over me with preposterous allegations of this and
that, leaving most people bemused, cold, or heading off in another
discussion.


Yes, we argued, and we disagreed, and we said nasty things (you more
than me it has to be said).

And I'll say it all again - you are a liar about your kids even this
week you've been caught out. You lie about being a successful writer and
editor when you have nothing to show for it other than some stuff 5 yrs
old. You've gloated several times on here about your pathetic Grand
Voyager that you need supposedly for your kids - kids that are at school
all day. You've gloated about having an easy lifestyle, in that those of
us that go out to work along with our wives/partners are some how
negligent. You can only do this on the back of your wifes work and your
kids benefits, there are many names for this leech springs to mind but
the more apt for you Ponce just about sums it up.


[Sighs.]

There he goes again with the angry and venomous outbursts.....

Please cite just one example where I have boasted about being a
"successful writer & editor".

(On a point of order, the last book I edited was three years ago,
though I do have a new one appearing soon. Yesterday you said I hadn't
edited anything for four years, today you're saying five.)

Please show me where I have "gloated" about having the car you mention
(a car whose make and model was - shock horror! - disclosed during a
general conversation about cars.

(I won't post links to the hundreds of boasts you have made about you
running two very successful businesses because I will allow people to
decide for themselves on the basis of your general intellect and the
sheer number of posts you make whilst apparently working.)

Please show me where I gloated about having a lifestyle. I'm pretty
sure I've said I like working from home on tasks and projects of my
choosing, but I don't think I claimed to be loafing around doing
nothing all day, quite the contrary. In fact, that's your allegation -
an allegation singularly bereft of evidence - not mine.

Finally, please prove to us all how I can "only" be enjoying this idle
and wealthy lifestyle that I allegedly boast about on the small
allowances my boys' are entitled to and my wife's part time earnings?
No, you're talking utter twaddle yet again, seemingly unaware that not
everybody works or claims "dole".

Although it is absolutely none of your business - and blindingly off
topic - you would no doubt be horrified to learn that we have a maid
who comes in for three hours a day during the week; that we have a
holiday cottage in Devon (sleeps eleven, no dogs); and that we have a
six week timeshare in Tuscany. No doubt you can weave all of this into
your sordid little fantasies about me.


To you obviously - you can't stay away, how many times have you flounced
out *never* to return then up you pop again? I'm here anyway as are many
of the regulars yet you make out *we* are the ones that are somehow
lacking for being here whilst appearing desperate to be here as well.


Oh, so flouncing is a crime now, is it? And there was me thinking it
was an expression of weariness at your eternal belly-aching about
arguments very few people are interested in.


  Will it be

something that you remember on your death-bed?

Not at all , when I leave here I don't give you any thought at all. You
however will have what you've done rammed down your throat at every
possible opportunity.- Hide quoted text -


That's just not true, is it? Clearly you log on to the internet with
frightening regularity to either snap at my heels or to read anything
new I have posted.

Oh dear, I've made the fatal mistake of validating you by responding
to one of your posts the way you respond to every one of mine. No
doubt we will be treated to some drunken soapbox lecture about what a
valuable public service you provide, full of pithy comments about
"scum", "cabbages" and "thieving ponces" - comments which I can't help
but feel are projectional, in that you may feel inadequate yourself,
which is why you are projecting your anger against a third party.

A bit like the OCD I mentioned at the beginning. Which reminds me, you
never did say whether seeing that child die affected you, or whether
you ever underwent counselling for post traumatic shock. I can't help
thinking that your obsessive campaign against me has - like Plowman's
and Hopeless's - more to do with problems in your own lives rather
than anything in mine.







.