Re: BBC star salary review under way


"Krustov" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:MPG.21ba0eeaf407d7fe98b01f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<quote>
The study will examine how salaries paid to the BBC's top talent compare
with the rest of the market.
</quote>

What the rest of the market does means jack *** as the rest of the
market is funded in a completely different chalk and cheese way .

<quote>
BBC director general Mark Thompson defended top talent salaries in front
of a Commons select committee last year, saying that a BBC which did not
secure big stars would not please the public.
</quote>

MT's comment is based on what ? .

If somebody can post a url to prove the bbc has asked a wide selection
of the uk public what they thought about this particular issue then i
for one would love to read it .




<<<


No, they will say they are "competing in a competitive multi-channel environment (SIC market)" and therefore have to bid against "other broadcasters" (SIC competitors) for "talent".

The conclusion the secretive committee will conclude is "the BBC did not over pay" and "secures licence fee payers value for money".

Anyway, if you don't like paying the BBC's "big talent", cunts who shout over music, DOG ***, biased news, limited pre-selected panels of talking heads, cooking and home make over programmes, soap operas, football Neanderthals, over-baring background music, intelligence free documentaries, and conceited self-advertisements, do as I do... or don't as the case is.

Don't watch them. Don't pay for them. And what the *** are they going to do... Write a letter of protest, LOL. Send round their "enforcers", ROFL.




.

Quantcast