Re: Pointless feature on digital TV guides
- From: Marcus Houlden <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Sep 2007 23:56:15 GMT
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 00:12:23 +0100, John Rowland <johnr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote the following to uk.media.tv.misc:
Poldie wrote:
On Sep 22, 8:41 pm, T <singh_ding_r...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Why does anyone need to know what was on 24-hours ago?
Good luck!
It's a failsafe in case you can't see what's on today. It works in the
same way that predicting the same weather for tomorrow that you had
today is more accurate over any given length of time than the actual
weather forecast is.
So why don't the weather forecasters just do that?
How do you know they don't?
One time I was listening to The World at One on R4, and Nick Clarke
apologised for not having details of the weather forecast but said that he
could see that the sun was shining.
mh.
--
http://www.nukesoft.co.uk
http://personal.nukesoft.co.uk
From address is a blackhole. Reply-to address is valid..
- References:
- Pointless feature on digital TV guides
- From: ™
- Re: Pointless feature on digital TV guides
- From: Poldie
- Re: Pointless feature on digital TV guides
- From: John Rowland
- Pointless feature on digital TV guides
- Prev by Date: Re: Groundhog Day
- Next by Date: Re: OT - What would happen if you tried not to go for a ***?
- Previous by thread: Re: Pointless feature on digital TV guides
- Next by thread: Re: Pointless feature on digital TV guides
- Index(es):