Re: OT: "Out of respect for Diana......"
- From: Ming The Occasionally Merciless <hauntedriver@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 12:53:23 -0700
On Jul 8, 6:50 pm, Resident Drunk <Nots...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ming The Occasionally Merciless wrote:
On Jul 8, 1:24 pm, Resident Drunk <Nots...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ming The Occasionally Merciless wrote:
On Jul 8, 11:21 am, Alan Hope <not.alan.h...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:I had been keeping out of this but I would just like to point out that
Col goes:(Sigh.)
If you think he's a nutter then just ignore him, but you can't can you,He will try to lose you your job, Col, if you best him in a Usenet
because let's face it you fucking *love* it, don't you?
tiff. He will attempt to get you sacked by lying to your boss. We have
proof positive of that. He did it to me and he threatened to do it to
others, trying and fucking up on one other occasion.
I said I wasn't going to say this again because I've said it about a
hundred times, but like an angry child in a temper tantrum, you just
keep refusing to acknowledge it let alone accept it.
If someone says something very offensive about your family then you
are perfectly entitled to take the gloves and fighty back in kind. The
proper thing to do would be to lodge a complaint with the person's ISP
but we all know that is a pretty pointless venture and won't stop the
person dashing off to get a new email address from elsewhere.
So, in those cases I think it perfectly legitimate to cause the family-
disparager as much trouble as possible with their employer *if* - and
it's a mighty big 'if' - they have been so stupid as to either a) post
their offensive messages from the workplace or b) if they link or
reference the employer in their posts (since this can be construed as
en endorsement for their actions).
Modern day employers do not tolerate either of the two things above.
It can in sometimes lead to disciplinary action. For that reason alone
it is a legitimate method by which to put an end to the unpleasant
abuse.
The bottom line is that you only have yourselves to blame. If you go
about saying unpleasant things about people's families, you can't
complain if you get the equivalent of a virtual bloody nose in reply.
The only time I have contacted someone's employer beyond these
boundaries occured when I called up an IT design company Jon Ross
(falsely) suggested he worked for. I didn't believe what he said so
just wanted to check whether he did work there. They said he didn't,
so I rang off. I had zero intention of causing him any trouble because
although we have exchanged strong words and he has pried heavily into
my own life, I can't recall him actually saying anything about
offensive about my family. All I wanted to do was to see if he was
telling the truth. Had I discovered that he had I would have given
more credence to some of his other claims.
this is a bare-faced lie. You get that? You are lying.
In one of your tiffs over a website you asked if I could do better. I
mentioned some people who I had developed websites for (presumably when
taking a break from presenting my TV and radio shows). That was it, I
never mentioned any company. You then searched for the people who I
mentioned, found another company who had worked for them and phoned them
up - you fucking weirdo.
So let's just say it one more time then it might actually penetrate that
thick skill of yours. I have never claimed to work for that company, I
have never heard of that company and when I offered a wager to prove I
had done what I claimed you bottled it and refused to take me up on it.
And yet you insist on wheeling out this lie over and over again.
It's probably best you don't mention me again as you consistently make a
fool of yourself when you do.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
It isn't rocket science to work out which company designed a website
for any given notable personage. It's usually stated at the bottom of
the home page. I just called up the company who designed a website
which you claim to have done and they denied ever having heard of you.
Quite how you manage to portray that as a 'lie' is frankly beyond me.
You made the claim, I checked it out, was unable to verify your claim,
end of story.
Please post a single link to a website I said I have designed. Go on.
Just one.
You can't because you are a liar. I never gave any links to any website,
you found *a* website for one of the people mentioned and phoned the
design company. This is not normal behaviour.
So I say again, you can rewrite what happened as often as you like, you
are still a liar, and incompetent one at that.
I refuse to get involved in a silly argument over any peripheral issue
because one of the things that people like you do is keep moving the
goalposts. If you want to be taken seriously (by me at least) then you
should do as I do, and let us all now who you really are and who you
work for. You have nothing to fear from me: as I have stated on
numerous occasions, there's no way I would set about making trouble
for you *unless* you made disparaging comments about my family (I
couldn't care a less what you say about me). However, I can see the
sense in remaining anonymous, so wouldn't blame you if decided to stay
as you are. But - and it's the crucial but - by the same token, you
can't expect people like me - who post links to our own websites - to
put up with your website stalking (I refer to your poring over my
website looking for chinks in my armour with which to attack me), nor
take your claims about your private life seriously.
Many months after the above incident you were again causing trouble for
someone so I posted a link to your 'wanking' page. It's all there on
Google for anyone to look at. Your response - 'someone wanted to know
what glamour pictures looked like' - laughable.
The bottom line is that 'real' people with websites have more
credibility than anonymous posters,
You have no credibility
and we deserve far more respect,
You deserve no respect
especially when those anonymous posters make boastful claims about
their own unverifiable lives,
The bet still stands - promise to leave here if I cannot prove a single
thing I have said and I will prove anything. Unlike you I do not post
lies, there are enough people on Usenet who know me in real life that I
would soon be shown up. Something which never bothers you.
or pour vitriolic scorn on 'real'people.
You are a cartoon character. You have 2 people in this thread defending
you and you still cannot manage to keep your stupid mouth shut long
enough to make yourself look half-way sympathetic.
I believe that anonymous posters should act with even more
courtesy and discretion than those who reveal their own identities,
instead of which, usenet is threatened by wave upon wave of nasty,
cowardly anonymities.
What you believe is irrelevant. I am not anonymous, a number of people
on this newsgroup have conversed with me via email and the postal
service, I have told you my name, what I do for a living and I genuinely
believe if you had any more information about me then you would try to
do something to cause myself or my business harm. You have a track
record you see. Let us just remind those supporting you that you have :
Popped up in newsgroups you have never posted in before to try to
ridicule posters from here.
Offered money to people for the address and details of people (yes,
that's right Daniel if you are reading this - offered money).
Gone to other newsgroups to ask if people have the home address of a poster.
Contacted the employers of people here who HAVE NEVER ATTACKED YOUR FAMILY.
Contacted MPs.
Contacted Granada
And finally, of course, tried to contact who you thought was my employer.
You see you can't have it both ways, elsewhere on this thread (or one of
the numerous others you have going) you claim that if someone posts from
or identifies their place of work then they are fair game, you say that
you only cause trouble off Usenet for people who disparage your family
which is a lie as you have tried it many times where no such attacks
were made.
You can't even resist from mentioning me in this thread and then
starting a new topic about me - because you are a stupid, incompetent,
unhinged prick.
You get it yet - YOU ARE A LIAR AND YOU ARE *** AT IT, SO STOP.
And as for anything threatening Usenet, I have been posting on it a hell
of a lot longer than you and one thing that is constant is that it has
always had its nutters, you are just one of a large group.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
So many ridiculous claims and distortions to correct, so little
time....so I don't think I'll bother in this case.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: "Out of respect for Diana......"
- From: Resident Drunk
- Re: OT: "Out of respect for Diana......"
- References:
- Re: OT: "Out of respect for Diana......"
- From: Mike Plowman
- Re: OT: "Out of respect for Diana......"
- From: Col
- Re: OT: "Out of respect for Diana......"
- From: Sofa - Spud
- Re: OT: "Out of respect for Diana......"
- From: Col
- Re: OT: "Out of respect for Diana......"
- From: Sofa - Spud
- Re: OT: "Out of respect for Diana......"
- From: Col
- Re: OT: "Out of respect for Diana......"
- From: Sofa - Spud
- Re: OT: "Out of respect for Diana......"
- From: Col
- Re: OT: "Out of respect for Diana......"
- From: Sofa - Spud
- Re: OT: "Out of respect for Diana......"
- From: Col
- Re: OT: "Out of respect for Diana......"
- From: Alan Hope
- Re: OT: "Out of respect for Diana......"
- From: Ming The Occasionally Merciless
- Re: OT: "Out of respect for Diana......"
- From: Resident Drunk
- Re: OT: "Out of respect for Diana......"
- From: Ming The Occasionally Merciless
- Re: OT: "Out of respect for Diana......"
- From: Resident Drunk
- Re: OT: "Out of respect for Diana......"
- Prev by Date: Re: Live Earth US
- Next by Date: Re: Overrunning sports bloody coverage!
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: "Out of respect for Diana......"
- Next by thread: Re: OT: "Out of respect for Diana......"
- Index(es):