Re: Curiously Amusing Harry Potter Puppets

On May 21, 9:52 am, Ed Chilada <nos...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 20 May 2007 16:26:02 -0700, Colin Paul Turner

<colinpaultur...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 20, 11:30 pm, Ming The Occasionally Merciless
<hauntedri...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

CPT is obviously a bit odd. His only contribution to UMTM would appear
to consist of this same tediously obsessive statement.

I think not. I distinctly remember wiping the floor with you over your
remarks regarding Linda Smith and the fact, or so you claimed, that
her style is virtually indistinguishable from that of Pam Ayres.

Claiming 'victories' over usenet arguments is really quite lame.

I agree, but it would make for an interesting (i.e. unintentionally
amusing) CV.

The only people who impress on usenet are the well-informed and the
witty. On the rare occasion when someone does demonstrably "win" an
argument, the atmosphere has usually turned so sour and nasty that any
victory or sense of achievement has beeb undermined.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: RADCOM DELIVERY
    ... Oh you wouldn't know how far I have moved on Gareth as I do not live on usenet and it plays no part in my life and is just the smallest of interests to me. ... I have directed no rude or snide remarks in your direction and if so, ... Grow up, Leigh! ...
    (uk.radio.amateur)
  • Re: Raleigh CDI
    ... I wouldnt sit quietly if someone said those remarks in person, ... dont know why I should let it go here in the rec. ... Responding doesn't make it stop. ... People become sociopaths on usenet - they simply ...
    (rec.equestrian)
  • Re: M3 candidates? (Was : Re: Completely OT...)
    ... never profain on air or usenet. ... I didn't originate any personal remarks. ...
    (uk.radio.amateur)
  • Re: Jim Oberg - Anti-Kook
    ... > add credence to your remarks. ... usenet comments if you haven't noticed. ... "Who needs credibility here?" ...
    (sci.space.policy)