Re: Epiphany re Alan Hope
- From: Sofa - Spud <comfysofas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 17 May 2007 11:42:55 -0700
On 17 May, 12:38, Ming The Occasionally Merciless
<hauntedri...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 16, 7:11 pm, Alan Hope <not.alan.h...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ming The Occasionally Merciless goes:
You clearly get off on swearing. Presumably swearing gives you an
erection and makes you feel big and strong. Not getting respect and
attention at work and home, eh?
Try to drag your mind away from my erection for a second.
You keep saying things like "people need to be reminded of the fact
that" and "everyone thinks" etc etc, yet clearly you aren't an elected
leader, and nor do you have an informal mandate to speak for the
majority of the group.
I've yet to see anyone contradict me.
Yet people do not "need" to be reminded of
anything.
Yes, they do. I can see how you'd rather it were not so, but your
comfort is no concern of mine.
What a thoroughly vain conceit it is to suggest they do.
Whatever. So I'm vain. At least I'm not a creepy stalker.
What you really means is that *you* need to keep reminding yourself
that you hate me. Why bother? We all know that.
I'm not the least bit concerned what you think, you despicable ***.
If you think I don't speak for the group, then the same goes for you a
thousand-fold, and there are only "800 subscribers".
Hopeless, I couldn't care a less about you.
I can see that from the way you post an 800-line defence to every
message I put out.
Unfortunately you care a
very great deal about me, which is why you are incapable of moving on
with your life.
Get used to it, fucker. I'm with you for as long as you're here.
Having some experience of dealing with ASD,
Dealing with it by lying around at home while the kids are at school,
yeah I know. Forgive me if I'm not terribly awe-struck.
I am
starting to form the opinion that your single-minded and unreasonable
obsessions point towards some real life mental disability.
A mental-health lame from the craziest motherfucker most of us have
ever come across. Ain't that rich?
If that is
the case, then UMTM may never be free of your angry "I speak for
everybody" tirades.
Not as long as you're around. You'd better get it into your head. The
matter is not up for discussion. You can suck it and swallow, or you
can *** off. Two choices, and no more.
--
AHhttp://grapes2dot0.blogspot.com
Epiphany time: I've suddenly realised why you need to "keep reminding
everybody" that I'm the world's most evil enemy since Adolf Hitler and
Dr Evil. It isn't just because you live a lonely disempowered life and
need to boost your own sense of self-importance by putting yourself
forward as the (very unelected) group dictator, it's because you know
that your employer is aware of your UMTM activities, and you're
terrified that she might form the opinion that you are an
embarrassment to both yourself and her journal. Hence your obsessive
compulsion to demonise me and to attack anyone else for daring to
engage in discussion with me.
Well thats funny because it was me the other day - the only nasty
stalking obsessive here is you , I personally think you are a net
loon . Strangely enough plenty of others do too , I don't speak for
them but it's strange how you have made yourself so universally
popular on usenet that your name is synonamous with net lunacy, not
funny posts or witty putdowns but weird nasty stalking and taking
stuff off usenet and into real life.
You're worried your credibility and your job is on the line, that's
why you're pestering me with this bizarre "I am going to keep on
pestering you for the sake of thr group" type nonsense. That's it,
isn't it? It is the perfect explanation for your actions. What's more,
you've been hinting at it all along, what with your frequent "I will
never forgive him for contacting my employer" style justifications. No
matter what reassurances your boss may have given you, her awareness
of your UMTM activity has angered and unsettled you, and you are
worried that she might one day decide that you are the problem and
that I am just a normal person.
You think you are normal?? you've got a delusional mind if you think
you are normal. Whilst in your delusional world you may think your
behaviour on UKMTVM is OK and most will have forgotten your dreadful
antics I think you'll find that many havn't forgotten . You may delude
yourself that if you hang around _not actually taking a proper part
just hanging around like a smell_ that somehow it'll be all better.
But it won't and horrifyingly whilst I was composing this post I
looked for links to what you hasd said before and what do you know?
for the last few days you've had crossposted to several different
groups anohter 1000 word essay on John Pelan . At least you had the
bloody right idea NOT to crosspost that here . But it shows one thing
- you can't live , or indeed function on any level without this
endless usenet conflict.
I've not put up a link - I can't stomach it - a peep at your
profilewill be enough for any memeber of the group who feels you are
"hard done by"
Hence your need to demonise me and to keep on demonsing me.
OK, two can play at that game. If you say that you will keep on
pestering me - butting in to stand alone threads to "remind everyone"
what I am (apparently) really like, etc etc - I will print out copies
of your more offensive posts and send them via papermail to the abuse
team at your ISP's head office and to your employer. In theory your
ISP has to reprimanded you for posting abusively and profanely, and
paper complaints might make them do that; and although your employer
may have complete confidence in you (as you claim they do), I'm sure
they'll soon start getting pissed off having your internet life shoved
in their faces every few days. My justification for bothering them
however will be that a) they divulged the contents of a private email
to you which you copied into usenet and b) that your compulsion to
keep on demonising is motivated by your need to assure them that I am
the problem, not you.
And anyone here NOT thinking you are as many have said a complete net
stalking loon , a vile stalker who will stop at nothing now must see
that you are as referenced above - a complete loon .
I have nothing to lose, old chap. All that you can do to me is to trot
around on the internet "reminding everyone" about me like a creepy old
stalker; what's more, you'll embarrass yourself in the process. In
contrast, I can cause trouble for you at work and with your ISP.
You are going to end up in trouble Barker - very serious trouble . I'd
very probably not be alone in wondering if such a man as you should be
a carer of children who may have special needs . I'm not sure that a
man who thinks this behaviour is acceptable is actually capable of
providing the correct enviorment for such children. Perhaps someone
ought to contact Social Services ? Perhaps once your name comes up on
their boards they'll pop round to see you, perhaps you'll make a fool
of yourself in front of them and perhpas they'll open a file on you.
Of course once said file is opened - you'll never get it closed and
they'll be over you like a rash.
By making threats and trying to act as a group tough guy you bring
this sort of thing on yourself. But I'm sure you know this; it can't
be the first time in your life that your big profanity-vomiting mouth
has caused you problems.-
Step back now because you'll can have no idea what trouble you could
cause yourself. But then again be my guest .
Does your wife know what you get up to?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Epiphany re Alan Hope
- From: Ming The Occasionally Merciless
- Re: Epiphany re Alan Hope
- References:
- Re: Ming the occasionally merciless
- From: Ming The Occasionally Merciless
- Re: Ming the occasionally merciless
- From: Alan Hope
- Re: Ming the occasionally merciless
- From: Ming The Occasionally Merciless
- Re: Ming the occasionally merciless
- From: Alan Hope
- Re: Ming the occasionally merciless
- From: Ming The Occasionally Merciless
- Re: Ming the occasionally merciless
- From: Alan Hope
- Epiphany re Alan Hope
- From: Ming The Occasionally Merciless
- Re: Ming the occasionally merciless
- Prev by Date: Re: The bbc defenders
- Next by Date: Re: SURVEY - Was the BBC better in 1964?
- Previous by thread: Re: Epiphany re Alan Hope
- Next by thread: Re: Epiphany re Alan Hope
- Index(es):
Loading