Chris Barker creepy netstalker cunt (Was Re: OT: Mike Plowman's Curious Hobby)
- From: Alan Hope <not.alan.hope@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 20:21:29 +0200
Zarok goes:
On May 5, 1:29 pm, Alan Hope <not.alan.h...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Zarok goes:
Returning to the issue of stalking. In my humble opinion, I think it's
valid to delve into someone's posting history and background if you
come into conflict with them, but I personally draw the line at
obsessing about things beyond that.
Liar. Your escapades far beyond looking things up in Google are
well-documented. Here, for example, is an email you sent in NOvember
last year:
BEGIN QUOTED MATERIAL
Dear Editor:
Far be if for me to judge, but it could be that that the newsgroup
antics of your staff contributor Alan Hope aka Ian MacDonald reflect
unfavourably upon The Bulletin.
http://groups.google.co.uk/groups/search?enc_author=UjUfqhYAAACrvEDNp...
NJvQIupvo4cocwWvDVg2RHsu8f1bCg&scoring=d
<http://groups.google.co.uk/groups/search?enc_author=UjUfqhYAAACrvEDNp...
qNJvQIupvo4cocwWvDVg2RHsu8f1bCg&scoring=d>
Mr Hope / MacDonald is frequently offensive, racist and offensive and
a clear audit trail from his posts to his web blog
(http://sour-grapes.blogsource.com
<http://sour-grapes.blogsource.com/> ) and thus to you can be
established.
I am rather surprised to find such an uncouth person working for so
respected a journal; one of my childhood friends was Flemish and he
first alerted me to your existence several years ago. I was quite
surprised to find that someone of Mr Hope / MacDonald¹s calibre was on
your payroll.
Anyway, as this individual has made derogatory racist and sexist
comments about my Turkish wife in the context of conducting a
supposedly adult discussion, I would not dream of subscribing to or
reading a journal with which he is associated, and thought I should
alert you to the damage he may be doing to your reputation.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Barker
END QUOTED MATERIAL
So there you are. You very much DO NOT "draw the line at obsessing
about things beyond that". In fact, one wonders if you draw any sort
of line at all.
You're not only a liar, Barking, you're a very stupid liar, when your
lies are so easy to demonstrate.
Wrong.
Had I been constantly stalking you or bombarding your employer with
letters then it would have been unreasonable, but my having done so at
one point in time and then moved on is proof the point I made in my
original post.
For everyone else in the known universe, one letter to a boss
establishes you once and for all time as a creepy stalker cunt. One is
too many, Barkingmad. Live with it.
If you have a spat or conflict with someone and then can't move on
afterwards, that's sad, that's unreasonable, and that's crossing the
line between acceptable and unacceptable behaviour.
That's you.
Unfortunately Pelan and Plowman are incapable of moving on, which is
why they suddenly turn up in the oddest of places months after this or
that conflict, suggesting that not only are they incapable of moving
on, but that they still nurture a grudge.
No, the stalker is you. It's on the record, and I just added it one
more time.
I'm not surrpised that you are unable to understand this concept
because you are a very stupid man. Only a stupid man would post
abusively in usenet whilst namedropping or referencing his employer,
Not that I did. That's just one of your many lies.
and only a stupid man would constantly argue about crap all day long
(as you do with others even when I'm not here).
Me, argue crap? I argue posts here. You come back when you're off your
meds and ONCE AGAIN begin to argue a dispute between you and a person
who no longer posts here.
Anyway, I shouldn't think there's a single person here who, faced with
the choice of me and you as Loony of the Week, would pick me. Well
possibly Hoggie. He's still miffed because he sent me his phone number
and I never call.
So I'm afraid you're not only the Creepy Stalker, you're also the
Stupid Cunt and the Mentally Ill Mentalist with the Fake Wife and Fake
Kids.
So I win.
--
AH
http://grapes2dot0.blogspot.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Chris Barker creepy netstalker cunt (Was Re: OT: Mike Plowman's Curious Hobby)
- From: Ming The Occasionally Merciless
- Re: Chris Barker creepy netstalker cunt (Was Re: OT: Mike Plowman's Curious Hobby)
- References:
- OT: Mike Plowman's Curious Hobby
- From: Zarok
- Re: OT: Mike Plowman's Curious Hobby
- From: Alan Hope
- Re: OT: Mike Plowman's Curious Hobby
- From: Zarok
- OT: Mike Plowman's Curious Hobby
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Mike Plowman's Curious Hobby
- Next by Date: Re: rab c nesbitt - time for a rerun ?
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Mike Plowman's Curious Hobby
- Next by thread: Re: Chris Barker creepy netstalker cunt (Was Re: OT: Mike Plowman's Curious Hobby)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|