Re: AMS GETS FIRED! (SPOILERS)
- From: "michael adams" <mjadams25@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 11:26:43 +0100
"Martin" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:knkm425jklkshniq8ncqhihbdqolf5m1i8@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 11:11:43 +0100, "michael adams"Apr
<mjadams25@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Martin" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dvim42pni8p8799qoa8nhm06fb1rhhnr11@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 10:07:06 +0100, "michael adams"
<mjadams25@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Roland Perry" <roland@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:aoOf+PFkaiSEFArV@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In message <4aug2gFurvogU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, at 11:50:04 on Sat, 22
2006, michael adams <mjadams25@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> remarked:
Although Schneider marketed the PCW at almost double the price as a
straight CP/M machine. At least that's according to......
I don't think it was double the price,
er,
"Alan Sugar explains the point
The Germans took the Joyce[...] but they entered the market at
nearly double the price, thinking they could soak up a lot of profit."
Do you believe everything Alan Sugar says?
Hence my use of the phrase - "At least that's according to......".
You repeatedly imply that Roland is wrong. Why?
If you actually take the trouble to read the thread, you'll
notice that I'm merely quoting material out a book Roland
proof read, when it was first published in 1990.
Alan Sugar. The Amstrad Story. David Thomas. Century London 1990
If, when I first raised the matter of the book a while back,
Roland had said "that's all rubbish don't believe a word
of it", that would have been good enough for me. But he didn't.
Roland sometimes corrects what I post, implying that I can't
in fact read.
Now which of those statements are you having such a problem
with?
michael adams
....
--
Martin
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: AMS GETS FIRED! (SPOILERS)
- From: Roland Perry
- Re: AMS GETS FIRED! (SPOILERS)
- References:
- Re: AMS GETS FIRED! (SPOILERS)
- From: michael adams
- Re: AMS GETS FIRED! (SPOILERS)
- From: Roland Perry
- Re: AMS GETS FIRED! (SPOILERS)
- From: michael adams
- Re: AMS GETS FIRED! (SPOILERS)
- From: Roland Perry
- Re: AMS GETS FIRED! (SPOILERS)
- From: michael adams
- Re: AMS GETS FIRED! (SPOILERS)
- From: Roland Perry
- Re: AMS GETS FIRED! (SPOILERS)
- From: michael adams
- Re: AMS GETS FIRED! (SPOILERS)
- From: Roland Perry
- Re: AMS GETS FIRED! (SPOILERS)
- From: michael adams
- Re: AMS GETS FIRED! (SPOILERS)
- From: michael adams
- Re: AMS GETS FIRED! (SPOILERS)
- Prev by Date: Re: Saturday Kitchen
- Next by Date: Re: That'll Teach 'Em - Long Division
- Previous by thread: Re: AMS GETS FIRED! (SPOILERS)
- Next by thread: Re: AMS GETS FIRED! (SPOILERS)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading