Re: Eastenders - A Tale of Two Brothers
- From: DavidM <newsNO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 18:51:52 +0100
A.Clews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
It's against all the laws o' physics, Jim!
Few things anger me as much as technically naive action sequences. Especially when the plot relies on them entirely for key events.
The Mercedes was thrown sideways by a carefully placed breaker bar, then hit a few bricks. The writer described the damage as a "bent axle" - on a rear wheel drive car with independent suspension.
The anti-gravity skips later danced in mid air in order to recreate a scene used every time the Mitchell brothers have an argument.
How can they invent nonsense like that, knowing full well that part of the 12m strong audience will be annoyed but the complete disregard for fact.
This writer should stick to sudden lesbian conversions and OAP love stories, their seem able to describe these in minute detail.
DavidM
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Eastenders - A Tale of Two Brothers
- From: tomScotland
- Re: Eastenders - A Tale of Two Brothers
- References:
- Eastenders - A Tale of Two Brothers
- From: Col
- Eastenders - A Tale of Two Brothers
- Prev by Date: Re: Subverted BBC Racism?
- Next by Date: Re: Amstrongs - DNA Spunk!!
- Previous by thread: Re: Eastenders - A Tale of Two Brothers
- Next by thread: Re: Eastenders - A Tale of Two Brothers
- Index(es):